Abstract:Abstract Globalization and financial processes have progressively generated an intense and problematic phenomenon of disconnection between companies and their territories. Breaking of the spatial link has often led to the breaking of the social bond and the rupture of territorial cohesion. In order to counteract this process of progressive lack of solidarity and social trust between companies and territorial communities, a very important role can be played by Corporate Social Responsibility. From few decades the European and the national reflection was focused on “Corporate Social Responsibility” considered a fundament strategy able to activate the (re) construction of new forms of solidarity and to create favorable conditions for social and economic sustainable growth, restoring continuity between activities and long-term effects connected to them. In this perspective, the corporate territorial welfare is its empirical expression, and a strategic tool to achieve the goal of counteract social and geographical peripherality to guarantee a polycentric and sustainable development of territories and highest level of quality of life of local communities. To grasp this new type of relationship that companies can establish with “their” territories starting from their choices of welfare, different models of corporate welfare introduced in some companies in Puglia have been analyzed. A specific attention has been dedicated to the particular form of corporate welfare extended to the territory and therefore to territorial stakeholders. These actions, when present, go well beyond the most classic attention to employees, and can be considered opportunities to give shape or rebuild the most direct link with the territories. In order to investigate the corporates’ welfare choices, we have used a qualitative methodology interviewing the human resources managers of several Apulian companies and asking them about welfare choices. From the analysis carried out it has been possible to define a typology of enterprises in relation to the adopted model of welfare. The objective that we intend to pursue with this ongoing research is to define a kind of open catalogue of good practices that can facilitate the choices of companies to adhere to innovative forms of corporate and territorial welfare.

Corporate Social Responsibility due diligence among European companies: The results of an interventionist research project with accountability and political implications

Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence and the New Boundaries of the Firms in the European Union

Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy, and NGO Activism in Europe and the United States: An Institutional-Stakeholder Perspective

Corporate governance and anti-corruption disclosure

The social regulation of corporate social irresponsibility: Reviewing the contribution of corporate reputation

Do responsible practices lead to higher firm productivity? Evidence from Europe

Individual Competencies for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Literature and Practice Perspective

The freedom to be sustainable, from the past to the future

Corporate social responsibility. A strategy for social and territorial sustainability

Corporate social responsibility, stakeholder engagement, and universities: New evidence from the Italian scenario

Preventive and Remedial Actions in Corporate Reporting Among "Addiction Industries": Legitimacy, Effectiveness and Hypocrisy Perception

Corporate social responsibility in relation to the economic dimension of socio-economic policy

Stakeholder Prioritization, Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Company Performance: Further Evidence

Corporate Social Responsibility, Benefits beyond Legitimacy: A Symbiotic Framework

The credibility of CSR (corporate social responsibility) reports in Europe. Evidence from a quantitative content analysis in 11 countries

Political Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility: Enhancing the Role of the Moral dimension

Corporate sustainability reporting: double materiality, impacts, and legal risk

Does corporate governance matter in corporate social responsibility disclosure? Evidence from Italy in the “era of sustainability”

Do Corporate Social Responsibility Engagements Lead to Real Environmental, Social, and Governance Impact?

Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR-related outcomes? A structured literature review based on empirical-quantitative research findings

The Contribution of Environmental and Social Standards Towards Ensuring Legitimacy in Supply Chain Governance