Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of fairness concern on the optimal pricing, carbon emission reduction (CER), green marketing efforts (GME) and utility of supply chain members in a two-echelon low-carbon supply chain composed of one manufacturer and one retailer. First, three basic models that consider the manufacturer's different attitudes toward the retailer's fairness concern are constructed. The optimal decisions of these models are obtained. Second, these optimal solutions are compared, and the effects of some key parameters including fairness concern on the optimal decisions and utility are examined for the three models. Furthermore, the manufacturer may misestimate the retailer's fairness concern; therefore, an extended model is proposed. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopt the manufacturer-led Stackelberg game theoretic framework, where the manufacturer decides the wholesale price and CER level and, then, the retailer determines the retail price and GME. Findings The results show that fairness concern has a negative impact on the wholesale price, the level of CER and GME, and fairness concern are not always beneficial for maximizing utility, although it is related to whether the manufacturer pays attention to the retailer's fairness concern. The manufacturer will gain more utility when considering the fairness concern of retailers than non-consideration. Overestimating or underestimating the fairness concern of the retailers does not lead to benefits for the manufacturer. Research limitations/implications This study has the following two limitations that need to be addressed in future research. First, the authors only consider the fairness concern of a single retailer but not peer-induced fairness among multiple competing retailers, which can be taken into account in future studies. Second, the demand function is linearly related to price, CER and GME. Because of the uncertainty of market information, the uncertainty demand function can be further considered. Originality/value This paper simultaneously considers the factors CER, GME and fairness concern. The utility function of the retailer is established according to taking the Nash bargaining solution as a fairness reference point, and four different models are constructed and compared.

Pricing Decisions in Dual-Channel Supply Chain considering Different Fairness Preferences and Low-Carbon Advertising Level

Decisions and Coordination of Dual-Channel Supply Chain considering Retailers’ Bidirectional Fairness Concerns under Carbon Tax Policy

Research on Carbon Emission Reduction and Pricing in Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns

Optimal Pricing Decisions for a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Fairness Concern under Carbon Quota Policy

Decision-making in a low-carbon supply chain considering consumers' fairness concerns

Pricing and Financing Strategies in a Dual-Channel Low-Carbon Supply Chain for Bilateral Capital-Constrained Retailers

Game theoretic analysis of prices and low-carbon strategy considering dual-fairness concerns and different competitive behaviours

Decision and Coordination of Low-Carbon E-Commerce Supply Chain with Government Carbon Subsidies and Fairness Concerns

Study of the Impact of Fairness Concern on Low Carbon Dual Channel Supply Chain

Price and Carbon Emission Reduction Decisions and Revenue-Sharing Contract Considering Fairness Concerns

Research of Dual-channel Supply Chain Decision with Consideration of Low-carbon and Fairness Concerns

Supply chain quality and pricing decisions with retailer fairness concerns and consumer dynamic reference quality effects

Research on Decision-Making and Coordination of Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Retailer's Fairness Concerns

Pricing Strategies in Dual-Channel Supply Chain with a Fair Caring Retailer

Pricing Policies of Green Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns and Altruistic Preferences Based on Consumers' Environmental Awareness and Channel Preference

Low carbon joint strategy and coordination for a dyadic supply chain with Nash bargaining fairness

Participant fairness concern and cost‐sharing‐based dual‐channel low‐carbon supply chain management

Carbon emission reduction and green marketing decisions in a two-echelon low-carbon supply chain considering fairness concern

Energy-saving and pricing decisions in a sustainable supply chain considering behavioral concerns

Operational Strategy for Low-Carbon Supply Chain under Asymmetric Information of Fairness Concerns

Pricing-decision analysis of green supply chain with two competitive manufacturers considering horizontal and vertical fairness concerns