Abstract:With the rising environmental concerns among consumers all over the world, sustainability has received considerable attention, and numerous enterprises are adopting various practices such as investing in energy-saving to improve sustainability in supply chains. However, many previous researches always assume that decision makers are perfectly rational and neglect the behavioral concerns of decision makers. This paper considers a two-stage sustainable supply chain with behavioral concerns in order to develop more realistic models, and mainly focuses on the energy-saving and pricing decisions in the decentralized system, as well as how to improve energy-saving level and profits. We develop decentralized decision-making models under two types of behavioral concerns: fairness concern and risk aversion, and derive the optimal strategy for each member with a Stackelberg game in which the manufacturer acts as the leader. The effect of the behavioral concerns on the optimal decisions and corresponding profits is discussed in detail. Theoretical analysis verified by numerical experiments shows that the fairness behavior always causes a negative effect on the manufacturer, total supply chain, and energy conservation, while it could benefit the retailer in profits. The risk aversion behavior always benefits the manufacturer, total supply chain, and energy conservation, whereas it could make the retailer suffer. Note that both the optimal energy-saving level and corresponding profit of the total supply chain under two types of behavioral concerns are lower than that in the centralized system, thereby we propose a revenue-cost-sharing contract to coordinate the supply chain, under which both the manufacturer and the retailer can achieve a win-win outcome and the energy-saving level can be improved. In addition, some managerial implications through our analytical and numerical results are summarized in this paper.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to make energy - saving and pricing decisions when considering behavioral concerns (such as fairness concerns and risk aversion) in sustainable supply chains. Specifically, the research focuses on the impact of the behavioral concerns of manufacturers and retailers on energy - saving levels and price decisions in decentralized systems, and how these decisions affect the overall profit and energy efficiency of the supply chain. In addition, the paper also explores the possibility of coordinating the supply chain by introducing a revenue - cost - sharing contract to improve the overall environmental and commercial performance of the supply chain. ### Main contributions of the paper: 1. **Establish a benchmark**: Establish a performance benchmark through a centralized system to obtain the system - optimal energy - saving level, retail price and corresponding profit. 2. **Decentralized decision - making model**: Develop a decentralized decision - making model under two behavioral concerns (fairness concerns and risk aversion), and use the Stackelberg game to derive the optimal strategy for each member, where the manufacturer is the leader and the retailer is the follower. 3. **Impact of behavioral concerns**: Discuss in detail the impact of the two behavioral concerns on the optimal equilibrium and corresponding profit, and compare the optimal energy - saving level, retail price and corresponding profit under complete rationality, behavioral concerns and the centralized system. 4. **Supply chain coordination**: Propose a revenue - cost - sharing contract to coordinate the supply chain to enhance the overall environmental and commercial performance of the supply chain. ### Main findings: - **Fairness concerns**: The retailer's fairness concerns always have a negative impact on the manufacturer, the entire supply chain and energy conservation, but may be beneficial to the retailer's profit. - **Risk aversion**: The retailer's risk - averse behavior is always beneficial to the manufacturer, the entire supply chain and energy conservation, but may cause damage to the retailer. - **Coordination effect**: Regardless of which behavioral concern the retailer is involved in, the optimal energy - saving level and corresponding profit in the decentralized system are lower than those in the centralized system. By introducing a revenue - cost - sharing contract, the coordination of the supply chain can be achieved, enabling both the manufacturer and the retailer to achieve a win - win situation and improve the energy - saving level. ### Management implications: - **Supply chain coordination**: By introducing an appropriate contract mechanism (such as a revenue - cost - sharing contract), the behavior of supply chain members can be effectively coordinated to achieve overall optimization. - **Impact of behavioral concerns**: When formulating energy - saving and pricing strategies, it is necessary to consider the behavioral concerns of supply chain members, especially fairness concerns and risk aversion, to avoid adverse effects. - **Policy recommendations**: The government can encourage enterprises to invest in energy - saving technologies and improve the sustainability of the supply chain by providing subsidies and incentives. Through these studies, the paper provides important theoretical and practical guidance for sustainable supply chain management.

Energy-saving and pricing decisions in a sustainable supply chain considering behavioral concerns

Decision-making in a low-carbon supply chain considering consumers' fairness concerns

Carbon emission reduction and green marketing decisions in a two-echelon low-carbon supply chain considering fairness concern

Optimal strategy for enterprises' green technology innovation considering individual disappointment avoidance and altruistic reference based on differential game theory

Competition between New Energy and Fuel Vehicles with Behavior-Based Pricing Strategies When Considering Environmental Concerns and Green Innovation

Supply chain decision-making of green products considering a retailer's fairness concerns under a pre-sale model

Behavior Choice and Emission Reduction in a Dynamic Supply Chain with a Capital-Constrained Retailer

Pricing Decisions in Dual-Channel Supply Chain considering Different Fairness Preferences and Low-Carbon Advertising Level

Differential game analysis of carbon emissions reduction and promotion in a sustainable supply chain considering social preferences

Research on Supply Chain Decision-making Considering Fairness Concerns and Green Technology Innovation

A low-carbon supply chain pricing mechanism considering CSR under carbon cap-and-trade policy

Green Investment Decision and Coordination in a Retailer-Dominated Supply Chain Considering Risk Aversion

A Dynamic Price Game Model in a Low-Carbon, Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Return Rates and Fairness Concern Behaviors

Optimal Decisions in a Multi-Party Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Green Marketing and Carbon Tax Policy

Research on low-carbon strategies in supply chain with environmental regulations based on differential game

Game theoretic analysis of prices and low-carbon strategy considering dual-fairness concerns and different competitive behaviours

Pricing Strategy and Collection Rate for a Supply Chain Considering Environmental Responsibility Behaviors and Rationality Degree

Optimal Decisions for Carbon Emission Reduction through Technological Innovation in a Hybrid-Channel Supply Chain with Consumers’ Channel Preferences

Participant fairness concern and cost‐sharing‐based dual‐channel low‐carbon supply chain management

Pricing and Green Promotion Decisions in a Retailer-Owned Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Multiple Manufacturers

Optimal Decision-Making of Retailer-Led Dual-Channel Green Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns under Government Subsidies