Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of fairness concern on the optimal pricing, carbon emission reduction (CER), green marketing efforts (GME) and utility of supply chain members in a two-echelon low-carbon supply chain composed of one manufacturer and one retailer. First, three basic models that consider the manufacturer's different attitudes toward the retailer's fairness concern are constructed. The optimal decisions of these models are obtained. Second, these optimal solutions are compared, and the effects of some key parameters including fairness concern on the optimal decisions and utility are examined for the three models. Furthermore, the manufacturer may misestimate the retailer's fairness concern; therefore, an extended model is proposed. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopt the manufacturer-led Stackelberg game theoretic framework, where the manufacturer decides the wholesale price and CER level and, then, the retailer determines the retail price and GME. Findings The results show that fairness concern has a negative impact on the wholesale price, the level of CER and GME, and fairness concern are not always beneficial for maximizing utility, although it is related to whether the manufacturer pays attention to the retailer's fairness concern. The manufacturer will gain more utility when considering the fairness concern of retailers than non-consideration. Overestimating or underestimating the fairness concern of the retailers does not lead to benefits for the manufacturer. Research limitations/implications This study has the following two limitations that need to be addressed in future research. First, the authors only consider the fairness concern of a single retailer but not peer-induced fairness among multiple competing retailers, which can be taken into account in future studies. Second, the demand function is linearly related to price, CER and GME. Because of the uncertainty of market information, the uncertainty demand function can be further considered. Originality/value This paper simultaneously considers the factors CER, GME and fairness concern. The utility function of the retailer is established according to taking the Nash bargaining solution as a fairness reference point, and four different models are constructed and compared.

Optimal strategy for enterprises' green technology innovation considering individual disappointment avoidance and altruistic reference based on differential game theory

Energy-saving and pricing decisions in a sustainable supply chain considering behavioral concerns

Dynamic Strategy for Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Retailers Competition and Technological Innovation

Research on the Mechanism of Collaborative Innovation in Green Technology among Supply Chain Enterprises Based on Cost Sharing and Market Competition

The optimal carbon emission reduction and advertising strategy with dynamic market share in the supply chain

Research on collaborative innovation among enterprises in green supply chain based on carbon emission trading

Research on Carbon Cap Regulation, Retailer Altruistic Preferences, and Green Decision-Making of Manufacturing Enterprises

Carbon emission reduction and green marketing decisions in a two-echelon low-carbon supply chain considering fairness concern

Shareable or exclusive: The decision regarding green technological innovation

Supply chain decision based on green investment subsidy and risk aversion

Dynamic and Stable R&D Strategies for Green Technology Based on Cooperative Differential Games

Differential Game Analysis of the Green Innovation Cooperation in Supply Chain under the Background of Dual-Driving

Differential Game Model for a Dual-Channel Supply Chain's Optimal Strategy under the Reference Carbon Emission Effect

Government Participation in Supply Chain Low-Carbon Technology R&D and Green Marketing Strategy Optimization

Optimal Decision-Making of Retailer-Led Dual-Channel Green Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns under Government Subsidies

Decision-making in a low-carbon supply chain considering consumers' fairness concerns

Dual-Channel Green Supply Chain Decision-Making and Coordination considering CSR and Consumer Green Preferences

The coordination mechanism of a risk-averse green supply chain

Optimal Decisions in Green, Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering the Competition and Cooperation Relationships between Different Types of Manufacturers

Differential game analysis of carbon emissions reduction and promotion in a sustainable supply chain considering social preferences

A differential game model based on the government subsidy strategy considering the green pharmaceutical problem and the goodwill of the company