Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of fairness concern on the optimal pricing, carbon emission reduction (CER), green marketing efforts (GME) and utility of supply chain members in a two-echelon low-carbon supply chain composed of one manufacturer and one retailer. First, three basic models that consider the manufacturer's different attitudes toward the retailer's fairness concern are constructed. The optimal decisions of these models are obtained. Second, these optimal solutions are compared, and the effects of some key parameters including fairness concern on the optimal decisions and utility are examined for the three models. Furthermore, the manufacturer may misestimate the retailer's fairness concern; therefore, an extended model is proposed. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopt the manufacturer-led Stackelberg game theoretic framework, where the manufacturer decides the wholesale price and CER level and, then, the retailer determines the retail price and GME. Findings The results show that fairness concern has a negative impact on the wholesale price, the level of CER and GME, and fairness concern are not always beneficial for maximizing utility, although it is related to whether the manufacturer pays attention to the retailer's fairness concern. The manufacturer will gain more utility when considering the fairness concern of retailers than non-consideration. Overestimating or underestimating the fairness concern of the retailers does not lead to benefits for the manufacturer. Research limitations/implications This study has the following two limitations that need to be addressed in future research. First, the authors only consider the fairness concern of a single retailer but not peer-induced fairness among multiple competing retailers, which can be taken into account in future studies. Second, the demand function is linearly related to price, CER and GME. Because of the uncertainty of market information, the uncertainty demand function can be further considered. Originality/value This paper simultaneously considers the factors CER, GME and fairness concern. The utility function of the retailer is established according to taking the Nash bargaining solution as a fairness reference point, and four different models are constructed and compared.

Supply chain quality and pricing decisions with retailer fairness concerns and consumer dynamic reference quality effects

Quality and Retail Pricing Decision in a Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns

Quality and Pricing Decisions in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain with Nash Bargaining Fairness Concerns

Pricing and Ordering Strategies of Supply Chain with Fairness-concerned Retailer and Demand Depending on the Retail Price

Pricing Models in Supply Chains under Exponential Demand with Absolute Fairness Concerns

Carbon emission reduction and green marketing decisions in a two-echelon low-carbon supply chain considering fairness concern

Fairness’s effect on the pricing decisions in a supply chain

Pricing Strategies in Dual-Channel Supply Chain with a Fair Caring Retailer

Coordination of a Supply Chain with Nash Bargaining Fairness Concerns

Pricing Decisions in Dual-Channel Supply Chain considering Different Fairness Preferences and Low-Carbon Advertising Level

Decision-making in a low-carbon supply chain considering consumers' fairness concerns

Optimal decisions in a closed-loop supply chain: fairness concerns, corporate social responsibility and information value

Pricing strategy and coordination mechanism of dual-channel supply chain based on reference quality effect

Dynamic analysis of a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns under carbon tax regulation

A dual-channel secondary closed-loop supply chain considering retail groups and fairness concerns

Interactive Impact of Fairness Concerns and Competition on Supply Chain Coordination

Optimal pricing and service level in supply chain considering misreport behavior and fairness concern

Supply chain coordination in quality improvement with reference effects

Supply Chain Partners' Decisions with Heterogeneous Marketing Efforts Considering Consumer's Perception of Quality

Low-Carbon supply chain optimisation with carbon emission reduction level and warranty period: nash bargaining fairness concern

A pricing/ordering model for a dyadic supply chain with buyback guarantee financing and fairness concerns