Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of fairness concern on the optimal pricing, carbon emission reduction (CER), green marketing efforts (GME) and utility of supply chain members in a two-echelon low-carbon supply chain composed of one manufacturer and one retailer. First, three basic models that consider the manufacturer's different attitudes toward the retailer's fairness concern are constructed. The optimal decisions of these models are obtained. Second, these optimal solutions are compared, and the effects of some key parameters including fairness concern on the optimal decisions and utility are examined for the three models. Furthermore, the manufacturer may misestimate the retailer's fairness concern; therefore, an extended model is proposed. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopt the manufacturer-led Stackelberg game theoretic framework, where the manufacturer decides the wholesale price and CER level and, then, the retailer determines the retail price and GME. Findings The results show that fairness concern has a negative impact on the wholesale price, the level of CER and GME, and fairness concern are not always beneficial for maximizing utility, although it is related to whether the manufacturer pays attention to the retailer's fairness concern. The manufacturer will gain more utility when considering the fairness concern of retailers than non-consideration. Overestimating or underestimating the fairness concern of the retailers does not lead to benefits for the manufacturer. Research limitations/implications This study has the following two limitations that need to be addressed in future research. First, the authors only consider the fairness concern of a single retailer but not peer-induced fairness among multiple competing retailers, which can be taken into account in future studies. Second, the demand function is linearly related to price, CER and GME. Because of the uncertainty of market information, the uncertainty demand function can be further considered. Originality/value This paper simultaneously considers the factors CER, GME and fairness concern. The utility function of the retailer is established according to taking the Nash bargaining solution as a fairness reference point, and four different models are constructed and compared.

Optimal decisions in a closed-loop supply chain: fairness concerns, corporate social responsibility and information value

A dual-channel secondary closed-loop supply chain considering retail groups and fairness concerns

Carbon emission reduction and green marketing decisions in a two-echelon low-carbon supply chain considering fairness concern

Pricing and strategy selection in a closed-loop supply chain under demand and return rate uncertainty

Research on Decision-Making and Coordination of Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Retailer's Fairness Concerns

Interactive Impact of Fairness Concerns and Competition on Supply Chain Coordination

Dynamic analysis of a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns under carbon tax regulation

Supply chain quality and pricing decisions with retailer fairness concerns and consumer dynamic reference quality effects

Manufacturer's cooperation strategy of closed-loop supply chain considering corporate social responsibility

Coordination in a closed-loop sustainable supply chain considering dual-channel and cost-sharing contract: Evidence from an emerging economy

Decision-making in a low-carbon supply chain considering consumers' fairness concerns

Optimal Decision-Making of Retailer-Led Dual-Channel Green Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns under Government Subsidies

Coordination Mechanism of E-Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Social Preference

Complex Dynamics in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Risk Aversion and Fairness Concerns Under Supply Disruption

Research on Supply Chain Decision-making Considering Fairness Concerns and Green Technology Innovation

Pricing Strategies in Dual-Channel Supply Chain with a Fair Caring Retailer

Pricing, carbon emission reduction, collection decision, and coordination in a low-carbon closed-loop supply chain

Game theoretic analysis of prices and low-carbon strategy considering dual-fairness concerns and different competitive behaviours

Operational Strategy for Low-Carbon Supply Chain under Asymmetric Information of Fairness Concerns

Logistics service strategy for e‐commerce supply chain: Interactive impacts of cost reduction effort and fairness concern

A Two-Stage Closed-Loop Supply Chain Pricing Decision: Cross-Channel Recycling and Channel Preference