Abstract:With the prevalence of low-carbon economic concepts and low-carbon lifestyles, government and enterprises around the world have taken measures to promote carbon abatement. The government encourages manufacturers to reduce carbon emissions by providing carbon abatement cost (CAC) subsidy, while also offering low-carbon consumption (LCC) subsidy to consumers to stimulate market demand and motivate manufacturers to furnish more low-carbon products. To figure out the effectiveness of each subsidy policy, this article constructs a dual-channel supply chain consisting of a single manufacturer and a single retailer. Among them, the manufacturer produces low-carbon products and sells them through both offline and online channels. The study considered four scenarios: no subsidy (the N model), only CAC subsidy (the C model), only LCC subsidy (the L model), and dual subsidy (the D model). The paper uses the Stackelberg game method to solve the equilibrium solutions of four models and compares subsidy policies from the perspectives of overall effectiveness and unit subsidy spending efficiency. The result shows that: (i) The carbon emission reductions, market demand, supply chain's profit, and consumer surplus of the dual subsidy policy are superior to those of the single subsidy policy, which in turn is superior to the no subsidy situation. In addition, under the same subsidy policy, the above indicators are better when the sales prices of offline and online channels are not consistent than when they are consistent. (ii) Compared to only CAC subsidy, the dual subsidy has lower efficiency in carbon emission reductions per unit subsidy, supply chain's profit per unit subsidy, and consumer surplus per unit subsidy. In addition, compared to only LCC subsidy, the dual subsidy results in more carbon emission reductions per unit subsidy, but supply chain's profit per unit subsidy and consumer surplus per unit subsidy show a phenomenon of first being higher and then lower. (iii) The unit subsidy spending efficiency of CAC subsidy decreases rapidly with the increase in the coefficient of CAC subsidy, while the unit subsidy spending efficiency of dual subsidy decreases rapidly with the increase in the coefficient of LCC subsidy. Finally, this study extracted management insights based on the above conclusions, providing reference for the government to formulate subsidy policies.

Decision and Coordination of Low-Carbon E-Commerce Supply Chain with Government Carbon Subsidies and Fairness Concerns

Decision-making in a low-carbon supply chain considering consumers' fairness concerns

Pricing and Coordination Decisions in Autonomous Reduction Low-Carbon Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns

A low-carbon supply chain pricing mechanism considering CSR under carbon cap-and-trade policy

Optimal Pricing Decisions for a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Fairness Concern under Carbon Quota Policy

Government Low-Carbon Regulations Based on Supply Chain Members' Behavior and Consumers' Channel Preference in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain.

The Impact of Government Subsidies on the Low-Carbon Supply Chain Based on Carbon Emission Reduction Level

Supply Chain Strategy Analysis of Low Carbon Subsidy Policies Based on Carbon Trading

Impact of Government Subsidy Strategies on Supply Chains Considering Carbon Emission Reduction and Marketing Efforts

The Impact of Different Government Subsidy Methods on Low-Carbon Emission Reduction Strategies in Dual-Channel Supply Chain

Optimal Decision-Making of Retailer-Led Dual-Channel Green Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns under Government Subsidies

Research on Green Supply Chain Formation and Government Subsidy Pricing Strategy Considering an Online Trading Platform

Study on Dual-channel Supply Chain Game under Carbon Subsidy Policy

Carbon Emission Reduction Decisions of Supply Chain Differential Game Under Different Government Intervention Models

Optimizing sustainability: a dual-channel supply chain model considering the carbon abatement cost subsidy and the low-carbon consumption subsidy

Joint emission reduction dynamic optimization and coordination in the supply chain considering fairness concern and reference low-carbon effect

Competition Among Supply Chains And Governmental Policy: Considering Consumers' Low-Carbon Preference

Decisions and Coordination of Dual-Channel Supply Chain considering Retailers’ Bidirectional Fairness Concerns under Carbon Tax Policy

Dynamic Decision and Coordination in a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering the Retailer's Social Preference

Influence of Government Subsidies on Carbon Reduction Technology Investment Decisions in the Supply Chain

Research on low-carbon strategies in supply chain with environmental regulations based on differential game