Analysis of sterilization efficiency and application cost of three low temperature sterilization methods

Hui Chen,Jiawei Liu,Aiying Zeng,Nian Qin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0175121

IF: 1.6

2024-04-01

Review of Scientific Instruments

Abstract:Objective: This paper discusses the sterilization efficiency of three low temperature sterilization methods used in thermosensitive medical devices and makes a preliminary analysis of sterilization costs so as to provide the basis for reasonable selection of low temperature sterilizer in Central Sterile Supply Department. Methods: Medical devices compatible with the three sterilization methods were selected for sterilization, and two packaging materials were selected for the three low-temperature sterilization equipment according to the compatibility of the packaging materials. The equipment packed with the same packaging materials were sterilized for five times, and each low-temperature sterilizer was sterilized for a total of ten times. The sterilization effect, sterilization cycle time, energy consumption, and cost of the three sterilizers were compared. Results: The cycle time of ethylene oxide sterilizer was 393.6 min, and the cycle time of hydrogen peroxide low temperature plasma sterilizer was 56.1 min. The cycle time of low temperature steam and formaldehyde sterilizer was 105.7 min. The hydrogen peroxide low temperature plasma sterilizes single cycle power consumption at a maximum of 5 kWh. The single cycle energy consumption of compressed air ethylene oxide sterilizer is up to 12 l. In terms of sterilization application cost, hydrogen peroxide low temperature plasma sterilization has the highest cost, followed by ethylene oxide sterilization, and low temperature steam and formaldehyde sterilization is the lowest. Conclusion: The sterilization efficiency of hydrogen peroxide low temperature plasma sterilization is the highest, followed by low temperature steam and formaldehyde sterilization, and the lowest is ethylene oxide sterilization. The three low temperature sterilization methods can achieve effective sterilization of devices. Each hospital can choose an appropriate low temperature sterilization method according to the characteristics of thermosensitive instruments, turnover efficiency requirements, and financial status.

instruments & instrumentation,physics, applied

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to explore the sterilization efficiency and application costs of three low-temperature sterilization methods (ethylene oxide sterilization, hydrogen peroxide low-temperature plasma sterilization, and low-temperature formaldehyde vapor sterilization) on heat-sensitive medical devices, and to provide a basis for hospital central sterile supply departments to choose suitable low-temperature sterilizers. The study compares data on cycle time, energy consumption, and costs of different sterilization methods to analyze the characteristics and applicable scopes of each method. The final conclusion is: hydrogen peroxide low-temperature plasma sterilization has the highest efficiency, followed by low-temperature formaldehyde vapor sterilization, with ethylene oxide sterilization being the least efficient; from a cost perspective, hydrogen peroxide low-temperature plasma sterilization is the most expensive, followed by ethylene oxide, and low-temperature formaldehyde vapor sterilization is the least expensive. Hospitals can choose the appropriate low-temperature sterilization method based on the characteristics of heat-sensitive devices, turnaround efficiency requirements, and financial conditions.