Abstract:Objective: Understanding the drivers of political violence is critical, given the destructive consequences it has on the fabric of society. Prior work has established the importance of situational and dispositional predictors of political violence, such as search for significance and meaning and experiencing trauma. However, these predictors do not fully account for one of its most worrisome ingredients—the tendency to feel aggrieved and to express that grievance violently. Here, we examine how trait victimhood undergirds individuals’ support for, and engagement with, political violence among Democrats and Republicans in the United States. Method: In Study 1 (N = 393), we examined the predictive power of trait victimhood on support for political violence. In Study 2 (N = 1,000), we tested the same model among a nationally representative sample of U.S. partisans with (self-reported) real-world participation in political violence. In Study 3 (N = 824), we experimentally examined whether inducing intergroup competitive victimhood increases support for political violence, as a function of trait victimhood. Results: In Studies 1–2, trait victimhood strongly predicted support for political violence—an association mediated through intergroup competitive victimhood beliefs. The association between search for meaning and support for violence was also moderated by trait victimhood. In Study 3, the intergroup competitive victimhood manipulation significantly increased support for political violence only among high trait victimhood participants. Conclusion: These results illustrate the importance of trait victimhood—a psychological mechanism that has been undervalued in this context—as a critical psychological force underlying political violence.

Intraparty Hostility: Social Identity, Subidentity, and the Hostile Media Effect in a Contested Primary

When Social Media Become Hostile Media: An Experimental Examination of News Sharing, Partisanship, and Follower Count

Whose media are hostile? The spillover effect of interpersonal discussions on media bias perceptions

Hostile Media or Hostile Source? Bias Perception of Shared News

Intergroup Bias in Political Decision Making

Party v. The People: Testing corrective action and supportive engagement in a partisan political context

Is the Media Biased Against Me? A Meta-Analysis of the Hostile Media Effect Research

Partisan Prejudice: The Role of Beliefs About the Unchanging Nature of Ideology and Partisans

Seeing Red (And Blue): Partisan Identity, Emotions, and Selective Exposure

Who thinks the media is hostile?! An examination of individual differences predicting the hostile media effect concerning news media coverage of individuals with a migratory background in Germany

Perceiver and target partisanship shift facial trustworthiness effects on likability

Policy over party: comparing the effects of candidate ideology and party on affective polarization

The Emotional Power of Partisan Media: A Computer Vision Analysis of the 2020 Democratic Party Presidential Primaries

Hostile media bias on social media: Testing the effect of user comments on perceptions of news bias and credibility

Media Framing and Partisan Identity: The Case of Immigration Coverage and White Macropartisanship

Divergent views of party positions: How ideology and own issue position shape party perception through convergence and divergence processes

Partisan animosity through the lens of blame: Partisan animosity can be reduced by a historicist thinking intervention

Beyond the Median Voter: How Affective Polarization Shapes Party Polarization in Multidimensional Ideological Spaces

Perceived victimhood shapes support for interpartisan political violence in the United States.

Partisan Asymmetries in Online Political Activity

The event-driven nature of online political hostility: How offline political events make online interactions more hostile