Abstract:Political advertising to recruit the support of voters is an inherent part of politics. Today, ads are distributed via television and online, including social media. This type of advertisement attempts to recruit support by presenting convincing arguments and evoking various emotions about the candidate, opponents, and policy proposals. We discuss recent arguments and evidence that a specific social emotion, namely the concept kama muta, plays a role in political advertisements. In vernacular language, kama muta is typically labeled as being moved or touched. We compare kama muta and anger theoretically and discuss how they can influence voters' willingness to support a candidate. We then, for the first time, compare kama muta and anger empirically in the same study. Specifically, we showed American participants short political ads during the 2018 United States midterm election campaigns. All participants saw both kama muta- and anger-evoking ads from both Democratic or Republican candidates. In total, everybody watched eight ads. We assessed participants' degree of being moved and angered by the videos and their motivation for three types of political support: ideational, financial, and personal. The emotional impact of an ad depended on its perceived source: Participants felt especially angry after watching the anger-evoking ads and especially moved by moving ads if they identified with the political party that had produced the video. Both emotions mediated were associated with increased intentions to provide support. Importantly, if one of the two emotions was evoked, its effect on political support was enhanced if participants identified with the party that had produced the ad. We discuss limitations of the method and implications of the results for future research and practice.

The Emotional Power of Partisan Media: A Computer Vision Analysis of the 2020 Democratic Party Presidential Primaries

Voter emotional responses and voting behaviour in the 2020 US presidential election

Images, Emotions, and Credibility: Effect of Emotional Facial Images on Perceptions of News Content Bias and Source Credibility in Social Media

Faces speak louder than words: Emotions versus textual sentiment in the 2024 USA Presidential Election

Visual priming and framing of the 2016 GOP and Democratic Party presidential primary debates

Partisan Media, Electoral Predictions, and Wishful Thinking

Road to the White House: Analyzing the Relations Between Mainstream and Social Media During the U.S. Presidential Primaries

The interplay of social rank perceptions of Trump and Biden and emotions following the U.S. presidential election 2020

Media Power Measuring Via Emotional Contagion

Need for Orientation and Third-Person Effects of the Televised Debates in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election

I Can Feel What You Feel: Emotion Exchanges in Twitter Conversations Between Candidates and the Public

Information sharing and political polarisation on social media: The role of falsehood and partisanship

Gender, Candidate Emotional Expression, and Voter Reactions During Televised Debates

Emotional Campaigning in Politics: Being Moved and Anger in Political Ads Motivate to Support Candidate and Party

Computational Assessment of Hyperpartisanship in News Titles

The Face of Populism: Examining Differences in Facial Emotional Expressions of Political Leaders Using Machine Learning

Partisan Media Effects Beyond One-Shot Experimental Designs

Perceived Poll Bias and Inference of Biased Poll Impact in the 2010 U . S . Midterm Elections : Media Performance in the Eyes of the Beholder

Going Emotional and Negative: an Effective Way to Attract Attention

Incorporating emotion into cue-based political judgment modeling.

Ambivalent Versus Univalent Voters: Perceived Media Influences and Third-Person Perceptions