Abstract:Online social networks have emerged as a significant platform for political discourse. In this paper we investigate what affects the level of participation of users in the political discussion. Specifically, are users more likely to be active when they are surrounded by like-minded individuals, or, alternatively, when their environment is heterogeneous, and so their messages might be carried to people with differing views. To answer this question, we analyzed the activity of about 200K Twitter users who expressed explicit support for one of the candidates of the 2012 US presidential election. We quantified the level of political activity (PA) of users by the fraction of political tweets in their posts, and analyzed the relationship between PA and measures of the users' political environment. These measures were designed to assess the likemindedness, e.g., the fraction of users with similar political views, of their virtual and geographic environments. Our results showed that high PA is usually obtained by users in politically balanced virtual environment. This is in line with the disagreement theory of political science that states that a user's PA is invigorated by the disagreement with their peers. Our results also show that users surrounded by politically like-minded virtual peers tend to have low PA. This observation contradicts the echo chamber amplification theory that states that a person tends to be more politically active when surrounded by like-minded people. Finally, we observe that the likemindedness of the geographical environment does not affect PA. We thus conclude that PA of users is independent of the likemindedness of their geographical environment and is correlated with likemindedness of their virtual environment. The exact form of correlation manifests the phenomenon of disagreement and, in a majority of settings, contradicts the echo chamber amplification theory.

Party v. The People: Testing corrective action and supportive engagement in a partisan political context

Opinion Polarization by Learning from Social Feedback

Integrated or Segregated? User Behavior Change after Cross-Party Interactions on Reddit

Effect of online political incivility on partisan attitude: role of issue involvement, moral identity and incivility accountability

Disentangling the Echo Chamber: How Exposure to Congruent and Incongruent Opinion Climates on Social Networking Sites Impacts Users’ Processing and Selection of Information

Partisan Asymmetries in Online Political Activity

Policy over party: comparing the effects of candidate ideology and party on affective polarization

Intraparty Hostility: Social Identity, Subidentity, and the Hostile Media Effect in a Contested Primary

Divergent views of party positions: How ideology and own issue position shape party perception through convergence and divergence processes

Correcting misperceptions of partisan opponents is not effective at treating democratic ills

The contingent reputational benefits of selective exposure to partisan information.

The Influence of Political Fit, Issue Fit, and Targeted Political Advertising Disclosures on Persuasion Knowledge, Party Evaluation, and Chilling Effects

When Social Media Become Hostile Media: An Experimental Examination of News Sharing, Partisanship, and Follower Count

Biased processing and opinion polarization: experimental refinement of argument communication theory in the context of the energy debate

The Opinion Factor: The Effects of Opinionated News on Information Processing and Attitude Change

Perceiver and target partisanship shift facial trustworthiness effects on likability

The Partisan Brain

Echo chamber amplification and disagreement effects in the political activity of Twitter users

Hostile media bias on social media: Testing the effect of user comments on perceptions of news bias and credibility

Testing the social pressure hypothesis: Does in-party social pressure reduce out-party empathy?

Shared partisanship dramatically increases social tie formation in a Twitter field experiment