Abstract:While first impressions of dominance and competence can influence leadership preference, social transmission of leadership preference has received little attention. The capacity to transmit, store and compute information has increased greatly over recent history, and the new media environment may encourage partisanship (i.e., "echo chambers"), misinformation and rumor spreading to support political and social causes and be conducive both to emotive writing and emotional contagion, which may shape voting behavior. In our pre-registered experiment, we examined whether implicit associations between facial cues to dominance and competence (intelligence) and leadership ability are strengthened by partisan media and knowledge that leaders support or oppose us on a socio-political issue of personal importance. Social information, in general, reduced well-established implicit associations between facial cues and leadership ability. However, as predicted, social knowledge of group membership reduced preferences for facial cues to high dominance and intelligence in out-group leaders. In the opposite-direction to our original prediction, this "in-group bias" was greater under <i>less</i> partisan versus partisan media, with partisan writing eliciting greater state anxiety across the sample. Partisanship also altered the salience of women's facial appearance (i.e., cues to high dominance and intelligence) in out-group versus in-group leaders. Independent of the media environment, men and women displayed an in-group bias toward facial cues of dominance in same-sex leaders. Our findings reveal effects of minimal social information (facial appearance, group membership, media reporting) on leadership judgments, which may have implications for patterns of voting or socio-political behavior at the local or national level.

Seeing Red (And Blue): Partisan Identity, Emotions, and Selective Exposure

The contingent reputational benefits of selective exposure to partisan information.

Partisan Selective Exposure as Discussion Preparation: The Role of Discussion Expectations and Entertainment Options

Selective exposure and echo chambers in partisan television consumption: Evidence from linked viewership, administrative, and survey data

Perceiver and target partisanship shift facial trustworthiness effects on likability

Partisan Bias in Political Judgment

Communication, Persuasion, and the Conditioning Value of Selective Exposure: Like Minds May Unite and Divide but They Mostly Tune Out

Intergroup Bias in Political Decision Making

Partisan Selective Exposure in TV Consumption Patterns: A Polarized Developing Country Context

Selective exposure in different political information environments – How media fragmentation and polarization shape congruent news use

Partisan Prejudice: The Role of Beliefs About the Unchanging Nature of Ideology and Partisans

Partisan animosity through the lens of blame: Partisan animosity can be reduced by a historicist thinking intervention

Partisan Media Effects Beyond One-Shot Experimental Designs

Partisans process policy-based and identity-based messages using dissociable neural systems

Cognitive Dissonance or Credibility? A Comparison of Two Theoretical Explanations for Selective Exposure to Partisan News

Confirmation biases in selective exposure to political online information: Source bias vs. content bias

Understanding Partisan Cue Receptivity: Tests of Predictions from the Bounded Rationality and Expressive Utility Perspectives

Social Transmission of Leadership Preference: Knowledge of Group Membership and Partisan Media Reporting Moderates Perceptions of Leadership Ability From Facial Cues to Competence and Dominance

Intraparty Hostility: Social Identity, Subidentity, and the Hostile Media Effect in a Contested Primary

Ensemble perception of emotion: Incidental effects of social identity.

Partisanship, Religion, and Issue Polarization in the United States: A Reassessment