Abstract:Individuals often preferentially avoid information that contradicts and seek information that aligns with their prior beliefs-a tendency referred to as "selective exposure." Traditionally, prior research has focused on intrapersonal drivers of selective exposure, including avoidance of cognitive dissonance. We take a complementary approach by investigating the conditions under which interpersonal concerns drive selective exposure. Drawing on a large literature on impression management, we test a social signaling model of selective exposure, which predicts that (a) individuals shift their information selection decisions to signal to observers and (b) observers reward such shifts. We test this model in the domain of partisan politics in the United States across five financially incentivized, preregistered experiments (N = 3,598). Our results extend prior theory by identifying three key contingencies: the type of task on which observers expect to collaborate with actors, alignment of group membership between observers and actors, and the magnitude of demonstrated selective exposure. Overall, we find that tailoring one's information selection decisions can indeed have strategic value-but only under certain theoretically predictable conditions. Our work also identifies an actor-observer misalignment: While observers are sensitive to the type of future interaction with an actor, the actors themselves do not intuit this sensitivity. In the era of social media, when information selection decisions are more public than ever and the spread of misinformation is pervasive, understanding the ways in which reputational considerations shape decision making not only illuminates why selective exposure persists, but also suggests novel mitigation strategies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Intergroup Bias in Political Decision Making

Partisan Bias in Political Judgment

Biased processing and opinion polarization: experimental refinement of argument communication theory in the context of the energy debate

In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis.

Intraparty Hostility: Social Identity, Subidentity, and the Hostile Media Effect in a Contested Primary

Seeing Red (And Blue): Partisan Identity, Emotions, and Selective Exposure

Social Identity Theory and Party Identification*

Partisan Prejudice: The Role of Beliefs About the Unchanging Nature of Ideology and Partisans

Divergent views of party positions: How ideology and own issue position shape party perception through convergence and divergence processes

The contingent reputational benefits of selective exposure to partisan information.

Perceiver and target partisanship shift facial trustworthiness effects on likability

Partisans process policy-based and identity-based messages using dissociable neural systems

Polarizing Political Polls: How Visualization Design Choices Can Shape Public Opinion and Increase Political Polarization

Understanding Partisan Cue Receptivity: Tests of Predictions from the Bounded Rationality and Expressive Utility Perspectives

Ethnocentrism, Social Identification, and Discrimination

The effect of political sophistication and party identification on voter–party congruence. A comparative analysis of 30 countries

Partisan Gaps in Political Information and Information-Seeking Behavior: Motivated Reasoning or Cheerleading?

Dynamics of Affective Polarization: From Consensus to Partisan Divides

Intergroup Bias in Attitudes Toward Restrictions on Uncivil Political Expression and Its Underlying Mechanisms

Partisan Media Effects Beyond One-Shot Experimental Designs

When do we care about political neutrality? The hypocritical nature of reaction to political bias