Abstract:Categorizing people into groups often leads to intergroup bias.Social identity theorists argue that being in a group can provide psychological benefits.As a result,people tend to favor their own group and exhibit hostility toward other groups,which is known as " in-group favoritism" and "out-group derogation," respectively.But there is also an increasing body of evidence indicating that people,typically low-status group members,sometimes display out-group favoritism,which refers to the tendency to express an evaluative preference for members of a group to which one does not belong.However,the issue of whether low-status groups have internalized the out-group favoritism is under debate.Jost and Burgess proposed that out-group favoritism among groups low in social standing was due to compliance with authority and self-protection.Mellott and Greenwald employed Implicit Association Test(IAT) and found low-status members displayed implicit out-group favoritism in cognition,emotion and behavior.Chinese researchers,who used the same method,also found similar findings.It illustrated that members in low-status groups indeed internalized the favoritism of high-status groups.But we noted that the used method typically was IAT.Jacoby suggests that this implicit way may not be " process pure" and is likely to involve both conscious and unconscious processes.In order to gain further understanding regarding low-status members' " real" implicit cognition about the high-status out-groups,it is important to dissociate these two cognitive processes and identify their respective contributions.To explore this issue,the current study adopted the process dissociation procedure.Besides,it is interesting to explore when low-status members has implicit out-group favoritism and how they evaluate their own group.Thus,process dissociation procedure was adopted to compute the separate contribution of conscious and unconscious processes when fifty rural undergraduates recognized trait words about urban group and rural group,and obtained the rural participants' implicit cognition of these two groups.The results showed that when rural undergraduates recognized the trait words about urban group,the contribution of unconscious processes for positive words was significantly greater than for negative words.However,the differences in contribution of unconscious processes between the rural group's positive words and negative words were not significant.It indicates that low status group members only have implicit out-group favoritism,but do not have in-group favoritism.

Ethnocentrism, Social Identification, and Discrimination

In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis.

Group Identity and Social Preferences

Overconfidence and Prejudice

Group identification and perceived self-group similarity: differentiating projection from introjection

Discrepancy in Ingroup Bias among Different Self‐construal Individuals: the Moderating Role of Group Types

Culture and group perception: dispositional and stereotypic inferences about novel and national groups

Ethnic Identity, Self-Esteem, and Ethnocentrism: A Study of Social Identity Versus Multicultural Theory of Development.

Intergroup Bias in Political Decision Making

Collective Self-Esteem Predicts the Extent to Which Low-Status Group Members Favor a High-Status Outgroup

Ingroup/Outgroup Favoritism among the Members of Low-Status Group By Using Process Dissociation Procedure

Intergroup biases: a focus on stereotype content

People perception and stereotype-based responding: task context matters

Self-focus and stereotyping of the self

Participating in a new group and the identification processes: The quest for a positive social identity

'(N)One of us but all of them!' Ingroup favouritism on individual and group levels in the context of deviant behaviour

Intergroup Behavior in Organizations

Self-stereotyping and Self-Anchoring Affect Social Identification: Selfesteem As a Moderator

Implications of Individualist Bias in Social Identity Theory for Cross-Cultural Organizational Psychology

Explaining the Outgroup Favoritism Phenomenon from the Perspective of Social Identity Theory

Conspiracy Beliefs and the Perception of Intergroup Inequalities