Abstract:While first impressions of dominance and competence can influence leadership preference, social transmission of leadership preference has received little attention. The capacity to transmit, store and compute information has increased greatly over recent history, and the new media environment may encourage partisanship (i.e., "echo chambers"), misinformation and rumor spreading to support political and social causes and be conducive both to emotive writing and emotional contagion, which may shape voting behavior. In our pre-registered experiment, we examined whether implicit associations between facial cues to dominance and competence (intelligence) and leadership ability are strengthened by partisan media and knowledge that leaders support or oppose us on a socio-political issue of personal importance. Social information, in general, reduced well-established implicit associations between facial cues and leadership ability. However, as predicted, social knowledge of group membership reduced preferences for facial cues to high dominance and intelligence in out-group leaders. In the opposite-direction to our original prediction, this "in-group bias" was greater under <i>less</i> partisan versus partisan media, with partisan writing eliciting greater state anxiety across the sample. Partisanship also altered the salience of women's facial appearance (i.e., cues to high dominance and intelligence) in out-group versus in-group leaders. Independent of the media environment, men and women displayed an in-group bias toward facial cues of dominance in same-sex leaders. Our findings reveal effects of minimal social information (facial appearance, group membership, media reporting) on leadership judgments, which may have implications for patterns of voting or socio-political behavior at the local or national level.

Preferences for group dominance track and mediate the effects of macro-level social inequality and violence across societies

Intergroup Consensus/disagreement in Support of Group-Based Hierarchy: an Examination of Socio-Structural and Psycho-Cultural Factors.

Rank Preserving Preferences

Rank Reversal Aversion Inhibits Redistribution Across Societies

Multicultural and Colorblind, Investigating Intergroup Ideologies and Relevant Relations in Mainland China

Predicting Human Behavior Toward Members of Different Social Groups.

Justifying Social Inequalities: The Role of Social Darwinism

An Integrative Interdisciplinary Perspective on Social Dominance Hierarchies.

Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward

US patriotism and ideologies of group dominance: a tale of asymmetry

Upholding the Social Hierarchy

Social Transmission of Leadership Preference: Knowledge of Group Membership and Partisan Media Reporting Moderates Perceptions of Leadership Ability From Facial Cues to Competence and Dominance

The ascent of man: Theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization.

Ethnic Groups' Access to State Power and Group Size

Himpathy and status: Attitudes to social hierarchy predict reactions to sexual harassment

Moral values, social ideologies and threat-based cognition: Implications for intergroup relations

Reproducing inequality through occupation: the mediating role of social dominance orientation in socioeconomic status and occupational choices

Belonging, Status, or Self-Protection? Examining Justice Motives in a Three-Level Cultural Meta-Analysis of Organizational Justice Effects

Know Your Place: Neural Processing of Social Hierarchy in Humans

How Social Class Shapes Attitudes on Economic Inequality: The Competing Forces of Self-Interest and Legitimation

The role of ideological and intergroup mechanisms in predicting opposition to redistribution and discrimination against the lower social class