Abstract:Over the past few decades, a new form of governance has emerged to replace adversarial and managerial modes of policy making and implementation. Collaborative governance, as it has come to be known, brings public and private stakeholders together in collective forums with public agencies to engage in consensus-oriented decision making. In this article, we conduct a meta-analytical study of the existing literature on collaborative governance with the goal of elaborating a contingency model of collaborative governance. After reviewing 137 cases of collaborative governance across a range of policy sectors, we identify critical variables that will influence whether or not this mode of governance will produce successful collaboration. These variables include the prior history of conflict or cooperation, the incentives for stakeholders to participate, power and resources imbalances, leadership, and institutional design. We also identify a series of factors that are crucial within the collaborative process itself. These factors include face-to-face dialogue, trust building, and the development of commitment and shared understanding. We found that a virtuous cycle of collaboration tends to develop when collaborative forums focus on ‘‘small wins’’ that deepen trust, commitment, and shared understanding. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of our contingency model for practitioners and for future research on collaborative governance. Over the last two decades, a new strategy of governing called ‘‘collaborative governance’’ has developed. This mode of governance brings multiple stakeholders together in common forums with public agencies to engage in consensus-oriented decision making. In this article, we conduct a meta-analytical study of the existing literature on collaborative governance with the goal of elaborating a general model of collaborative governance. The ultimate goal is to develop a contingency approach to collaboration that can highlight conditions under which collaborative governance will be more or less effective as an

Augmenting the IAD framework to reveal power in collaborative governance – An illustrative application to resource industry dominated processes

Power in Collaborative Approaches to Governance for Water: A Systematic Review

A Framework for Assessing Power in Collaborative Governance Processes

Using a design approach to create collaborative governance

Using Network Analysis to Identify Key Actors in Collaborative Governance Processes

Visibility and Invisibility: Structural, Differential, and Embedded Power in Collaborative Governance of Fisheries

Who benefits from collaborative governance? An empirical study from the energy sector

Beyond engagement: Enhancing equity in collaborative water governance

Integrating collaborative governance theory with the Advocacy Coalition Framework

Advancing socio-ecological considerations in impact assessment of extractive industries: A realist interview study in the Canadian context

The Environmental Performance of Participatory and Collaborative Governance: A Framework of Causal Mechanisms

Understanding Effectiveness in its Broader Context: Assessing Case Study Methodologies for Evaluating Collaborative Conservation Governance

Applying collective action frameworks to analyse local-level collaboration for electric vehicle-related policies

Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice

Collaborative Governance and Environmental Justice: Disadvantaged Community Representation in California Sustainable Groundwater Management

Rethinking Perspectives of Power in Collaborative Governance

“Two-Row” cross-cultural learning for collaborative governance of forestland in northwestern Ontario, Canada

Assessing Collaborative Governance Outcomes and Indicators across Spatial and Temporal Scales: Stewardship Contract Implementation by the United States Forest Service

Examining the Contextual Factors Influencing Intersectoral Action for the SDGs: Insights From Canadian Federal Policy Leaders

Leading the charge: A qualitative case-study of leadership conditions in collaborative environmental governance structures