Abstract:Over the past few decades, a new form of governance has emerged to replace adversarial and managerial modes of policy making and implementation. Collaborative governance, as it has come to be known, brings public and private stakeholders together in collective forums with public agencies to engage in consensus-oriented decision making. In this article, we conduct a meta-analytical study of the existing literature on collaborative governance with the goal of elaborating a contingency model of collaborative governance. After reviewing 137 cases of collaborative governance across a range of policy sectors, we identify critical variables that will influence whether or not this mode of governance will produce successful collaboration. These variables include the prior history of conflict or cooperation, the incentives for stakeholders to participate, power and resources imbalances, leadership, and institutional design. We also identify a series of factors that are crucial within the collaborative process itself. These factors include face-to-face dialogue, trust building, and the development of commitment and shared understanding. We found that a virtuous cycle of collaboration tends to develop when collaborative forums focus on ‘‘small wins’’ that deepen trust, commitment, and shared understanding. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of our contingency model for practitioners and for future research on collaborative governance. Over the last two decades, a new strategy of governing called ‘‘collaborative governance’’ has developed. This mode of governance brings multiple stakeholders together in common forums with public agencies to engage in consensus-oriented decision making. In this article, we conduct a meta-analytical study of the existing literature on collaborative governance with the goal of elaborating a general model of collaborative governance. The ultimate goal is to develop a contingency approach to collaboration that can highlight conditions under which collaborative governance will be more or less effective as an

Integrating collaborative governance theory with the Advocacy Coalition Framework

Lessons from the Advocacy Coalition Framework for climate change policy and politics

Policy learning in collaborative environmental governance processes

Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice

Evaluating Change in Representation and Coordination in Collaborative Governance Over Time: A Study of Environmental Justice Councils

How Structural Variations in Collaborative Governance Networks Influence Advocacy Involvement and Outcomes

A Comparative Analysis of Drivers of Collaborative Governance in Front-of-Pack Food Labelling Policy Processes

Using Network Analysis to Identify Key Actors in Collaborative Governance Processes

A Framework for Assessing Power in Collaborative Governance Processes

Understanding inclusion in collaborative governance: a mixed methods approach

Justice System Reform for Health Equity: A Mixed Methods Examination of Collaborating for Equity and Justice Principles in a Grassroots Organizing Coalition

Network Governance in Action: Functions and Practices to Foster Collaborative Environments

Using a design approach to create collaborative governance

Understanding Effectiveness in its Broader Context: Assessing Case Study Methodologies for Evaluating Collaborative Conservation Governance

Structural Community Governance: Importance for Community‐Academic Research Partnerships

Unpacking the Collaborative Toolbox: Why and When Do Public Managers Choose Collaborative Governance Strategies?

Beyond engagement: Enhancing equity in collaborative water governance

Collaborative Governance at Scale: Examining the Regimes, Platforms, and System in the State of Oregon

Exploring Collaborative Governance Processes Involving Nonprofits