Abstract:Over the past few decades, a new form of governance has emerged to replace adversarial and managerial modes of policy making and implementation. Collaborative governance, as it has come to be known, brings public and private stakeholders together in collective forums with public agencies to engage in consensus-oriented decision making. In this article, we conduct a meta-analytical study of the existing literature on collaborative governance with the goal of elaborating a contingency model of collaborative governance. After reviewing 137 cases of collaborative governance across a range of policy sectors, we identify critical variables that will influence whether or not this mode of governance will produce successful collaboration. These variables include the prior history of conflict or cooperation, the incentives for stakeholders to participate, power and resources imbalances, leadership, and institutional design. We also identify a series of factors that are crucial within the collaborative process itself. These factors include face-to-face dialogue, trust building, and the development of commitment and shared understanding. We found that a virtuous cycle of collaboration tends to develop when collaborative forums focus on ‘‘small wins’’ that deepen trust, commitment, and shared understanding. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of our contingency model for practitioners and for future research on collaborative governance. Over the last two decades, a new strategy of governing called ‘‘collaborative governance’’ has developed. This mode of governance brings multiple stakeholders together in common forums with public agencies to engage in consensus-oriented decision making. In this article, we conduct a meta-analytical study of the existing literature on collaborative governance with the goal of elaborating a general model of collaborative governance. The ultimate goal is to develop a contingency approach to collaboration that can highlight conditions under which collaborative governance will be more or less effective as an

Rethinking Perspectives of Power in Collaborative Governance

A Framework for Assessing Power in Collaborative Governance Processes

Power in Collaborative Approaches to Governance for Water: A Systematic Review

Unpacking the Collaborative Toolbox: Why and When Do Public Managers Choose Collaborative Governance Strategies?

Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice

Power: Toward a Unifying Analytical Framework

Toward a Critical Theory of Collaborative Governance

Contingencies of Power Sharing in Collaborative Governance

Using a design approach to create collaborative governance

Using Network Analysis to Identify Key Actors in Collaborative Governance Processes

Power in global governance: an expanded typology from global health

Power Differences and Dynamics in Multiparty Collaborative Systems: A Systematic Literature Review

Augmenting the IAD framework to reveal power in collaborative governance – An illustrative application to resource industry dominated processes

Understanding Factors and Mechanisms for Collaborative Governance Based on Smart Technologies

Evaluating Change in Representation and Coordination in Collaborative Governance Over Time: A Study of Environmental Justice Councils

The Social Ecology of Power in Participatory Health Research

Investigating Innovative Models of Governance and Collaboration for Effective Public Administration in a Multi-Stakeholder Landscape

Public Values and Public Participation: A Case of Collaborative Governance of a Planning Process

Collaborative Governance in Mainland China and Hong Kong: Introductory Essay