Abstract:Over the past decade, social accountability for health has coalesced into a distinct field of research and practice. Whether explicitly stated or not, changed power relations are at the heart of what social accountability practitioners seek, particularly in the context of sexual and reproductive health. Yet, evaluations of social accountability programs frequently fail to assess important power dynamics. In this commentary, we argue that we must include an examination of power in research and evaluation of social accountability in sexual and reproductive health, and suggest ways to do this. The authors are part of a community of practice on measuring social accountability and health outcomes. We share key lessons from our efforts to conduct power sensitive research using different approaches and methods.First, participatory research and evaluation approaches create space for program participants to engage actively in evaluations by defining success. Participation is also one of the key elements of feminist evaluation, which centers power relations rooted in gender. Participatory approaches can strengthen 'traditional' health evaluation approaches by ensuring that the changes assessed are meaningful to communities.Fields from outside health offer approaches that help to describe and assess changes in power dynamics. For example, realist evaluation analyses the causal processes, or mechanisms, grounded in the interactions between social, political and other structures and human agency; programs try to influence these structures and/or human agency. Process tracing requires describing the mechanisms underlying change in power dymanics in a very detailed way, promoting insight into how changes in power relationships are related to the broader program.Finally, case aggregation and comparison entail the aggregation of data from multiple cases to refine theories about when and how programs work. Case aggregation can allow for nuanced attention to context while still producing lessons that are applicable to inform programming more broadly.We hope this brief discussion encourages other researchers and evaluators to share experiences of analysing power relations as part of evaluation of social accountability interventions for sexual and reproductive health so that together, we improve methodology in this crucial area.

The Social Ecology of Power in Participatory Health Research

Interrogation, Negotiation, and Subversion of Power Differentials in Community-Based Participatory Research: A Scoping Review

How Theory and Research Inform Citizen Participation in Poor Communities: The Ecological Perspective and Theories on Self- and Collective Efficacy and Sense of Community

Participatory research: real or imagined

Elucidating empowerment in El Proyecto Bienestar (the Well-Being Project)

The split ladder of participation: A literature review and dynamic path forward

Creating a Culture of Empowerment in Research: Findings from a Capacity-Building Training Program

Engage, participate, empower: Modelling power transfer in disadvantaged rural communities

How long-term emancipatory programming facilitates participatory evaluation: Building a methodology of participation through research with youth in Honduras

Confronting the Complexities of “Co-Production” in Participatory Health Research: A Critical, Reflexive Approach to Power Dynamics in a Collaborative Project on Parkinson’s Dance

Unearthing the political: differences, conflicts and power in participatory urban design

Micropolitics in Participatory Processes: The Impact of Ablism and Other 'Hidden' Power Structures on Equitable Participation and Outcomes

Power and the people's health

Unpacking power dynamics in research and evaluation on social accountability for sexual and reproductive health and rights

Power, Empowerment and Social Participation- the Building of a Conceptual Model

' ¡ Eso no se dice'!: Exploring the value of communication distortions in participatory planning

Aiming for transformations in power: lessons from intersectoral CBPR with public housing tenants (Québec, Canada)

Power, Privilege, and Precarity: Attempts to Conduct Ethical Youth Participatory Action Research as Early Career Researchers

Increasing public participation and influence in local decision-making to address social determinants of health: a systematic review examining initiatives and theories

The Merits and Pitfalls of Participatory Action Research: Navigating Tokenism and Inclusion with Lived Experience Members

Perspectives of Community Co-Researchers About Group Dynamics and Equitable Partnership Within a Community–Academic Research Team