Abstract:Background The cocreation of eHealth solutions with potential users, or co-design, can help make the solution more acceptable. However, the co-design research approach requires substantial investment, and projects are not always fruitful. Researchers have provided guidelines for the co-design approach, but these are either applicable only in specific situations or not supported by empirical data. Ways to optimize the experience of the co-design process from the point of view of the participants are also missing. Scientific literature in the co-design field generally provides an extrinsic description of the experience of participants in co-design projects. Objective We addressed this issue by describing a co-design project and focusing on the participants’ experiences looking at what was significant from their point of view. Methods We used a qualitative situated cognitive anthropology approach for this study. Data were collected on a co-design research project that aimed to support the help-seeking process of caregivers of functionally dependent older adults. The methodology was based on the perspective of experience by Dewey and used the course-of-action theoretical and methodological framework. Data collection was conducted in 2 phases: observation of participants and recording of sessions and participant self-confrontation interviews using the session recordings. We interviewed 27% (20/74) of the participants. We analyzed the data through nonexclusive emerging categorization of themes using the constant comparative method. Results In total, 5 emerging themes were identified. The perception of extrinsic constraints and the effects of the situation was central and the most important theme, affecting other themes (frustrating interactions with others, learning together, destabilization, and getting personal benefits). Co-occurrences between codes allowed for a visual and narrative understanding of what was significant for the participants during this project. The results highlighted the importance of the role of the research team in preparing and moderating the sessions. They also provided a detailed description of the interactions between participants during the sessions, which is a core aspect of the co-design approach. There were positive and negative aspects of the participants’ experiences during this co-design project. Reflecting on our results, we provided potential affordances to shape the experience of participants in co-design. Conclusions Potential users are an essential component of the co-design research approach. Researchers and designers should seek to offer these users a positive and contributory experience to encourage participation in further co-design initiatives. Future research should explore how the proposed affordances influence the success of the intervention.

Confronting the Complexities of “Co-Production” in Participatory Health Research: A Critical, Reflexive Approach to Power Dynamics in a Collaborative Project on Parkinson’s Dance

'Building bridges': reflections and recommendations for co-producing health research

Co-producing research with people impacted by dementia and service providers: issues and challenges

The Social Ecology of Power in Participatory Health Research

What Do We Know About Sharing Power in Co-Production in Mental Health Research? A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis

Co-production: A resource to guide co-producing research in the sport, exercise, and health sciences

Finding the balance: the choreography of participatory research with children and young people

Public Participation in Health and Social Care: Exploring the Co-production of Knowledge

Building ethical awareness to strengthen co-production for transformation

User Experience of the Co-design Research Approach in eHealth: Activity Analysis With the Course-of-Action Framework

Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health - a perspective on definition and distinctions.

Voice, Choice and Power: Using co-production to develop a community engagement strategy for an ethnically diverse community

Mechanisms for co-designing and co-producing health and social care: a realist synthesis

Interrogation, Negotiation, and Subversion of Power Differentials in Community-Based Participatory Research: A Scoping Review

Co-producing active lifestyles as whole-system-approach: theory, intervention and knowledge-to-action implications

A virtuous cycle of co-production: Reflections from a community priority-setting exercise

Perspectives of Community Co-Researchers About Group Dynamics and Equitable Partnership Within a Community–Academic Research Team

Embracing complexity and uncertainty to create impact: exploring the processes and transformative potential of co-produced research through development of a social impact model

Co-production as praxis: Critique and engagement from within the university

Transforming Integrated Care Through Co-production: A Systematic Review Using Meta-ethnography

"What it really takes" - A qualitative study of how professionals coproduce healthcare service with immigrant patients