Abstract:Abstract Over the past few decades, cities have repeatedly demonstrated high levels of ambition with regard to climate action. Global environmental governance has been marked by a proliferation of policy actions taken by local governments around the world to demonstrate their potential to advance climate change mitigation and adaptation. Leading ‘by example’ and demonstrating the extent of action that it is possible to deliver, cities have aspired to raise the ambition of national and international climate governance and put action into practice via a growing number of ‘climate change experiments’ delivered on the ground. Yet accounts of the potential of cities in global environmental governance have often stopped short of a systematic valuation of the nature and impact of the networked dimension of this action. This article addresses this by assessing the nature, and challenges faced by, urban climate governance in the post‐Paris era, focusing on the ‘experimentation’ undertaken in cities and the city networks shaping this type of governance. First, we unpack the concept of ‘urban climate change experimentation’, the ways in which it is networked, and the forces driving it. In the second and third parts of the article, we discuss two main pitfalls of networked urban experimentation in its current form, focusing on issues of scaling experiments and the nature of experimentation. We call for increased attention to ‘scaling up’ experiments beyond urban levels of governance, and to transformative experimentation with governance and politics by and in cities. Finally, we consider how these pitfalls allow us to weigh the potential of urban climate ambition, and consider the pathways available for supporting urban climate change experimentation.While the analytical conflation of sub‐state and non‐state actors is understandable in the context of the traditional focus of global governance research on nation states, we would like to gently point out that to scholars working on urban governance, equating a city with a non‐state actor such as a multinational corporation is incomprehensible and analytically useless. To push forward the research agenda, future work on climate governance should make clear distinctions between local governments and other actors from the outset.

Applying collective action frameworks to analyse local-level collaboration for electric vehicle-related policies

Overcoming collective action barriers to energy sustainability: A longitudinal study of climate protection accord adoption by local governments

A Longitudinal Network Analysis of Intergovernmental Collaboration for Local Economic Development

Regional Governance and Institutional Collective Action for Environmental Sustainability

Hierarchical Interventions and Environmental Collaboration among Municipal Governments: a Bottom-Up Analysis

From Risk Governance to City–Citizen Collaboration: Capitalizing on individual adaptation to climate change

What Propels Municipal Governments to Collaborate? The Case of Thematic Environmental Association in Chile

Collaborative Governance at Scale: Examining the Regimes, Platforms, and System in the State of Oregon

Policy implementation styles and local governments: the case of climate change adaptation

Characterizing Non-governmental Organizations And Local Government Collaborations In Urban Forest Management Across Canada

The science of urban regions: Public-science-community partnerships as a new mode of regional governance?

The Emergence of Inter-Municipal Collaboration: Evidence from Metropolitan Planning in Portugal

Collaborative governance challenges in energy efficiency and conservation: The case of Pennsylvania

Policy coordination and integration in local government: perspectives on barriers

Coping with Functional Collective Action Dilemma: Functional Fragmentation and Administrative Integration

Collective adaptation to climate change

Networking Cities after Paris: Weighing the Ambition of Urban Climate Change Experimentation

The networked micro-decision context: a new lens on transformative urban governance

Policy Advocacy, Network Formation and Network Governance

Facilitating inter-municipal collaboration through mandated collaborative platform: evidence from regional environmental protection in China

Understanding the science-policy interface in urban climate governance from a co-production perspective: Insights from the cases of Hamburg and São Paulo