AIDING AND ABETTING AGAINST PHEOMENAL FORMS OF CRIME

Igor Zduński

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.0374

2018-12-07

Abstract:Considering the comprehensive issue of aiding and abetting, several preliminary remarks should be made with regard to the concept of perpetration. The term of perpetration in relation to an event (act, deed, effect) is also used in praxeology2. The conclusions of praxeology and the process of framing the Polish criminal law put perpetration as a model concept with respect to the concept of co-perpetration and incitement or aiding and abetting. This reference has an impact on mutual relations between perpetration and other phenomenal forms including aiding and abetting as described in the doctrine and jurisdiction. The nature of these relations has varied. Can the perpetration ground, common for other phenomenal forms, provide the source of analyses for particular phenomenal forms? Perhaps just the full understanding of the essence of perpetration can facilitate comprehending other phenomenal forms. To my mind, depicting other phenomenal forms especially aiding and abetting seems highly reasonable from the perspective of perpetration because it may provide constructive conclusions.