Misunderstandings and Corrections of Fraud Accomplices in Helping Withdrawals
Ye Liang-fang,Yuan Yu-jie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-3745.2023.01.002
2023-01-01
Abstract:In view of the act of helping to withdraw money in telecommunication network fraud, there are three major misunderstandings in practice: "accomplices in telecommunication and network fraud are mainly co-offenders", "co-offenders in telecommunication network frauds do not need to have criminal contact", and "co-offenders in telecommunication network frauds are all accessory criminal". At present, there is an urgent need to correct the joint crime of fraudulent acts. Specifically, first of all, the qualitative logic of such behaviors should be established as the priority to identify independent crimes, and the accomplices of fraud crimes to take the second place. Secondly, in terms of attribution standards, the subjective knowledge of helping the withdrawer is the key to determining the quality of his behavior. Based on the theory of functional causality, the point of the criminal participation of the payee, its identity type, and the division of labor should be regulated, and it should be judged whether they realized that they and others were committing telecommunication network fraud crimes when they acted. Finally, through the organizational identity of the withdrawer and its subjective understanding, it is judged whether he is the leader or key member of the fraud group, or has played an important or key role in the realization of the fraud crime, so as to define his main and accomplice status in the joint crime.