Abstract:Based on data collected from China Law Year Book and practice in one district in east of China from 1997 to 2007,this paper conducts an empirical study on the operation of current Chinese Criminal Procedural Law.Although there are some variations,the data from the district demonstrates all the characteristics demonstrated by China Law Year Book,that is,very low rate of non—prosecution and non— guilty decision,low percentage of defendant appeal and high rate of affirmation of original judgment in second instance trial and trial supervision procedure,which strengthens the conclusion that Chinese criminal process is decided by criminal investigation. A process decided by investigation procedure means once a case is transferred by the investigative organ to be reviewed and prosecuted,it is very likely to be convicted.Most of the first instance trial just reviews and verifies the evidence collected in the investigation procedure.Such process is different from the "trial—center" criminal procedure of western countries.Such process has some advantages,such as encouraging investigative organs to find out the truth of the case by all means and to screen out most of the suspects in the early stage of criminal process to save procedural resources and make suspects get rid of criminal proceedings earlier.However,it does have some disadvantages.It makes investigative organs under great pressures to collect guilty evidence, which would infringe the human rights of the suspects.Moreover,it also makes the public trial a "rubber stamp" to the investigation procedure and cannot revise errors made in investigation. Current judicial reform chooses trail procedure as the breakthrough,and the investigation procedure seems quiet by comparison.This approach of reform is wrong.To be successful in criminal judicial reform,we must start from investigation procedure.The reform of investigation procedure is too ambitious a topic for this paper to look into.But the decision made by the investigative organ at the end of the investigation is the turning point of criminal proceeding.Establishing effective supervision of this turning point is the key to Chinese criminal process.

Procedural Correction of Criminal Justice for the Crime of Aiding Information Network Criminal Activities

Public Cases, Authentication Opinions, and Amendments to Law of Criminal Procedure

Current status, obstacles and advice for improvement on expert assistant system

The Pretrial Agreement System of American Corporate Crime in the Perspective of Constitutionalism:Reviewing the Stein Case

The Exploration of the Expansion and Restriction Path of Judicial Application of the Crime of Assisting Information Network Criminal Activities

Criminalization Challenge and Analysis of Network Crime Assistance Behaviors

The Identification of "Knowingly" in Crime of Assisting in Information Network-Related Criminal Activities

Characteristics and Countermeasures of Assisting Information Network Criminal Activities

Definition of etc. Behavior in the Crime of Assisting Information Network Criminal Activities

Criminal Methodology and Judicial Logic

Construction of Prevention Mechanism against Wrongful Convictions:Based on Proceeding and Evidence System

For the Procedural Amelioration of the Criminal Trial

What Kind of Criminal Legal Aid System does China Need

On the Investigation of Sentencing Information

The Criminal Law Protection on Network Intellectual Property Rights

An Empirical Study on Operation of Chinese Criminal Procedure Law

The Predicament of Criminal Reconciliation System and Possible Solutions

Decriminalization Path of Net Neutrality Assisting Actions: A Perspective from Aiding and Abetting Cybercrimes

Community Correction and the Modification of the Criminal Law

On the Procedural Sanction of the Criminal Actions

Retrospection and Reflection on the Criminal Judicial Reform in Recent Years