Effects of Aggregate Types and Softening Effect on Multiaxial Mechanics Properties of Lightweight Aggregate Concrete

Jianhui Yang,Dongdong Yuan,Dainwu Huang,Qinting Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4047606

2022-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Softening effect of lightweight aggregate (LWA) and concrete after a period of hydrostatic immersion on multiaxial mechanical properties of LWA concrete (LWAC), porosity of shale ceramsite (SC) and shale pottery (SP) and softening coefficient of SC were firstly tested and analysed to investigate the effect of aggregate types. LC30 all-lightweight SC concrete (ALWSCC, also known as all-lightweight concrete, ALWC) is then used as the benchmark. SC and SP were replaced with limestone gravel (LSG) and river sand (RS), respectively, in a single or simultaneous way using the same volume fraction. gravel lightweight concrete (GLWC), sand lightweight concrete (SLWC) and hybrid aggregate lightweight concrete (HALWC) were formed in turn, and ALWC, SLWC, GLWC and HALWC are collectively known as LWACs. The four kinds of LWACs were casted into corresponding specification and size specimens and demoulded after indoor curing for 24 hours (h), with their target ages (7–180 days [d]) maintained using standard and hydrostatic curing. Tests for strength and initial elastic modulus under uniaxial stress, ultimate compression strength and stress–strain curves under triaxial stress were carried out to analyse the influence of aggregate types and curing methods on mechanical properties and softening effect of LWACs. Results showed that all kinds of mechanical properties decreased after 180 d of hydrostatic curing (experimental age of conventional triaxial compression test is 90 d later). ALWC demonstrated the most evident decrease, followed by SLWC, HALWC and GLWC, thereby indicating that normal aggregates can significantly improve the softening effect of LWACs. Failure modes of triaxial compression specimens changed from splitting failure to shear failure, plastic platform phenomenon on stress–strain curves appeared and their descending section was gentler than that of the uniaxial compression test with the increase of confining pressure. Although relationships between ultimate compressive strengths and confining pressures of LWACs can be accurately described using Mohr–Coulomb single- (M–C criterion), Hsieh–Ting–Chen four- (H–T–C criterion) and Willam–Warnke five- (W–W criterion) parameter failure criteria, the three failure criteria demonstrate some application limitations according to meridian equation and deviatoric plane analysis. Extension trend of compression meridian of LWACs after 90 d of hydrostatic curing is basically the same, and types of aggregates exert a minimal effect on the meridian and deviatoric plane limit trace. The softening effect of LWACs is mainly caused by the softening effect of SC itself and the influence of pore water on matrix concrete.