Abstract:Definitions of neutrality, normality, deviance as well as aberrance for coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty were proposed in this study according to their distribution frequencies. This can be seen as an important first step towards a safe transition from the conventional one‐size‐fits‐all to a more personalised coronal alignment target. Purpose One of the most pertinent questions in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is: what could be considered normal coronal alignment? This study aims to define normal, neutral, deviant and aberrant coronal alignment using large data from a computed tomography (CT)‐scan database and previously published phenotypes. Methods Coronal alignment parameters from 11,191 knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients were measured based on three dimensional reconstructed CT data using a validated planning software. Based on these measurements, patients' coronal alignment was phenotyped according to the functional knee phenotype concept. These phenotypes represent an alignment variation of the overall hip knee ankle angle (HKA), femoral mechanical angle (FMA) and tibial mechanical angle (TMA). Each phenotype is defined by a specific mean and covers a range of ±1.5° from this mean. Coronal alignment is classified as normal, neutral, deviant and aberrant based on distribution frequency. Mean values and distribution among the phenotypes are presented and compared between two populations (OA patients in this study and non‐OA patients from a previously published study). Results The arithmetic HKA (aHKA), combined normalised data of FMA and TMA, showed that 36.0% of knees were neutral within ±1 SD from the mean in both angles, 44.3% had either a TMA or a FMA within ±1–2 SD (normally aligned), 15.3% of the patients were deviant within ±2–3 SD and only 4.4% of them had an aberrant alignment (±3–4 SD in 3.4% and >4 SD in 1.0% of the patients respectively). However, combining the normalised data of HKA, FMA and TMA, 15.4% of patients were neutral in all three angles, 39.7% were at least normal, 27.7% had at least one deviant angle and 17.2% had at least one aberrant angle. For HKA, the males exhibited 1° varus and females were neutral. For FMA, the females exhibited 0.7° more valgus in mean than males and grew 1.8° per category (males grew 2.1° per category). For TMA, the males exhibited 1.3° more varus than females and both grew 2.3° and 2.4° (females) per category. Normal coronal alignment was 179.2° ± 2.8–5.6° (males) and 180.5 > ± 2.8–5.6° (females) for HKA, 93.1 > ± 2.1–4.2° (males) and 93.8 > ± 1.8–3.6° (females) for FMA and 86.7 > ± 2.3–4.6° (males) and 88 > ± 2.4–4.8° (females) for TMA. This means HKA 6.4 varus or 4.8° valgus (males) or 5.1° varus to 6.1° valgus was considered normal. For FMA HKA 1.1 varus or 7.3° valgus (males) or 0.2° valgus to 7.4° valgus was considered normal. For TMA HKA 7.9 varus or 1.3° valgus (males) or 6.8° varus to 2.8° valgus was considered normal. Aberrant coronal alignment started from 179.2° ± 8.4° (males) and 180.5 > ± 8.4° (females) for HKA, 93.1 > ± 6.3° (males) 93.8 > ± 5.4° (females) for FMA and 86.7 > ± 6.9° (males) and 88 > ± 7.2° (females) for TMA. This means HKA > 9.2° varus or 7.6° valgus (males) or 7.9° varus to 8.9° valgus was considered aberrant. Conclusion Definitions of neutrality, normality, deviance as well as aberrance for coronal alignment in TKA were proposed in this study according to their distribution frequencies. This can be seen as an important first step towards a safe transition from the conventional one‐size‐fits‐all to a more personalised coronal alignment target. There should be further definitions combining bony alignment, joint surfaces' morphology, soft tissue laxities and joint kinematics. Level of Evidence III.

Functional knee phenotypes: a novel classification for phenotyping the coronal lower limb alignment based on the native alignment in young non-osteoarthritic patients

Phenotyping of hip–knee–ankle angle in young non-osteoarthritic knees provides better understanding of native alignment variability

Three-dimensional-based native alignment phenotype classification system: Description for use in planning for deformities during total knee arthroplasty

Phenotyping the knee in young non-osteoarthritic knees shows a wide distribution of femoral and tibial coronal alignment

Functional knee phenotypes: A helpful classification tool for visualizing potential femoral varus in restricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty in Japan

Osteoarthritic and non-osteoarthritic patients show comparable coronal knee joint line orientations in a cross-sectional study based on 3D reconstructed CT images

Variability of three-dimensional knee morphology cannot be effectively assessed using a coronal plane knee alignment classification in total knee arthroplasty patients

Evaluating axial alignment and knee phenotypes in a young Indian population, using X-rays converted to three-dimensional bone models, and their relevance in total knee arthroplasty

Pre- and postoperative Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee classification and its impact on clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty

Functional knee phenotypes appear to be more suitable for the Chinese OA population compared with CPAK classification: A study based on 3D CT reconstruction models

Femoral and tibial phenotypes of varus alignment in a Southeast Asian arthritic population: a descriptive study

Deformity in valgus knee malalignment is not only in the femur but also in tibia or both, based on demographic and morphological analysis before and after knee osteotomies

Neutral alignment resulting from tibial vara and opposite femoral valgus is the main morphologic pattern in healthy middle-aged patients: an exploration of a 3D-CT database

Definition of normal, neutral, deviant and aberrant coronal knee alignment for total knee arthroplasty

Coronal Plane Alignment Classification of Arthritic Knees in a South Indian Population and Functional Outcome Comparison Post-mechanical Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty

The phenotypic diversity of anteromedial osteoarthritis before and after treatment with medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A radiographic analysis of 1000 knees

The role of limb alignment on natural tibiofemoral kinematics and kinetics

Only 26% of Native Knees Show an Identical Coronal Functional Knee Phenotype in the Contralateral Knee

Alignment in TKA: what has been clear is not anymore!

Mechanical alignment for primary TKA may change both knee phenotype and joint line obliquity without influencing clinical outcomes: a study comparing restored and unrestored joint line obliquity

Alignment Strategies in Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Rise and Role of Enabling Technology