Abstract:Definitions of neutrality, normality, deviance as well as aberrance for coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty were proposed in this study according to their distribution frequencies. This can be seen as an important first step towards a safe transition from the conventional one‐size‐fits‐all to a more personalised coronal alignment target. Purpose One of the most pertinent questions in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is: what could be considered normal coronal alignment? This study aims to define normal, neutral, deviant and aberrant coronal alignment using large data from a computed tomography (CT)‐scan database and previously published phenotypes. Methods Coronal alignment parameters from 11,191 knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients were measured based on three dimensional reconstructed CT data using a validated planning software. Based on these measurements, patients' coronal alignment was phenotyped according to the functional knee phenotype concept. These phenotypes represent an alignment variation of the overall hip knee ankle angle (HKA), femoral mechanical angle (FMA) and tibial mechanical angle (TMA). Each phenotype is defined by a specific mean and covers a range of ±1.5° from this mean. Coronal alignment is classified as normal, neutral, deviant and aberrant based on distribution frequency. Mean values and distribution among the phenotypes are presented and compared between two populations (OA patients in this study and non‐OA patients from a previously published study). Results The arithmetic HKA (aHKA), combined normalised data of FMA and TMA, showed that 36.0% of knees were neutral within ±1 SD from the mean in both angles, 44.3% had either a TMA or a FMA within ±1–2 SD (normally aligned), 15.3% of the patients were deviant within ±2–3 SD and only 4.4% of them had an aberrant alignment (±3–4 SD in 3.4% and >4 SD in 1.0% of the patients respectively). However, combining the normalised data of HKA, FMA and TMA, 15.4% of patients were neutral in all three angles, 39.7% were at least normal, 27.7% had at least one deviant angle and 17.2% had at least one aberrant angle. For HKA, the males exhibited 1° varus and females were neutral. For FMA, the females exhibited 0.7° more valgus in mean than males and grew 1.8° per category (males grew 2.1° per category). For TMA, the males exhibited 1.3° more varus than females and both grew 2.3° and 2.4° (females) per category. Normal coronal alignment was 179.2° ± 2.8–5.6° (males) and 180.5 > ± 2.8–5.6° (females) for HKA, 93.1 > ± 2.1–4.2° (males) and 93.8 > ± 1.8–3.6° (females) for FMA and 86.7 > ± 2.3–4.6° (males) and 88 > ± 2.4–4.8° (females) for TMA. This means HKA 6.4 varus or 4.8° valgus (males) or 5.1° varus to 6.1° valgus was considered normal. For FMA HKA 1.1 varus or 7.3° valgus (males) or 0.2° valgus to 7.4° valgus was considered normal. For TMA HKA 7.9 varus or 1.3° valgus (males) or 6.8° varus to 2.8° valgus was considered normal. Aberrant coronal alignment started from 179.2° ± 8.4° (males) and 180.5 > ± 8.4° (females) for HKA, 93.1 > ± 6.3° (males) 93.8 > ± 5.4° (females) for FMA and 86.7 > ± 6.9° (males) and 88 > ± 7.2° (females) for TMA. This means HKA > 9.2° varus or 7.6° valgus (males) or 7.9° varus to 8.9° valgus was considered aberrant. Conclusion Definitions of neutrality, normality, deviance as well as aberrance for coronal alignment in TKA were proposed in this study according to their distribution frequencies. This can be seen as an important first step towards a safe transition from the conventional one‐size‐fits‐all to a more personalised coronal alignment target. There should be further definitions combining bony alignment, joint surfaces' morphology, soft tissue laxities and joint kinematics. Level of Evidence III.

Alignment in TKA: what has been clear is not anymore!

Boundaries in Kinematic Alignment: Why, When, and How

No Difference in Limb Alignment Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: What is the optimal alignment correction to achieve success? The role of kinematic alignment

Is There a Gold Standard for TKA Tibial Component Rotational Alignment?

Personalized alignment techniques better restore the native trochlear groove compared to systematic alignment techniques in total knee arthroplasty

Not all knees are the same

The effect of different alignment strategies on trochlear orientation after total knee arthroplasty

Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a five-year prospective, multicentre, survivorship study

Kinematic alignment recreates femoral trochlear geometry more closely than mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty

Sparse and inconsistent reporting of pre‐ and post‐operative radiographic angles of total knee arthroplasty using true unrestricted kinematic alignment: An umbrella review and secondary meta‐analysis

Conventionally instrumented inverse kinematic alignment for total knee arthroplasty: How is it done?

Mechanical Alignment in Knee Replacement Homogenizes Postoperative Coronal Hip–Knee–Ankle Angle in Varus Knees: A Navigation-Based Study

Correlation Between Preoperative and Postoperative Alignment and Kinematic Gait in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Restoration of the native tibial joint line obliquity in total knee arthroplasty with inverse kinematic alignment does not increase knee adduction moments

Alignment is only part of the equation: High variability in soft tissue distractibility in the varus knee undergoing primary TKA

Definition of normal, neutral, deviant and aberrant coronal knee alignment for total knee arthroplasty

Mechanical alignment for primary TKA may change both knee phenotype and joint line obliquity without influencing clinical outcomes: a study comparing restored and unrestored joint line obliquity

Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Adjusted Restricted Kinematic Alignment for the Treatment of Severe Varus Deformity: Technical Note

Maintaining the Physiological Lateral Flexion Gap in the Kinematically Aligned TKA Does Not Compromise Clinical Outcomes at One-Year Follow-Up

Widening of tibial resection boundaries increases the rate of femoral component valgus and internal rotation in functionally aligned TKA