Abstract:Purpose To identify, synthesise and critically appraise findings of systematic reviews and meta‐analyses on pre‐ and post‐operative radiographic angles (lateral distal femoral angle [LDFA], medial proximal tibial angle [MPTA] and hip–knee–ankle [HKA] angle) of unrestricted kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods Two authors searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Epistemonikos for systematic reviews, with or without meta‐analyses, that reported on TKA outcomes using unrestricted kinematic alignment. The methodological quality of the included systematic reviews and meta‐analyses was independently assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR‐2). The effect size with its 95% confidence interval (CI) for radiographic angles was extracted from the systematic reviews and meta‐analyses. The characteristics of clinical studies included in systematic reviews were listed and tabulated. Pre‐ and post‐operative MPTA, LDFA and HKA angles were summarised using meta‐analytic random‐effects models. Results Nineteen records were eligible for data extraction. Systematic reviews and meta‐analyses included 44 clinical studies, of which 31 were on unrestricted kinematic alignment and 13 were on restricted versions of kinematic alignment. None of the included systematic reviews or meta‐analyses fulfiled all seven critical AMSTAR‐2 domains. Few comparative studies reported both pre‐ and post‐operative angles (LDFA, n = 3; MPTA, n = 4; and HKA angle, n = 10). Mean pre‐ and post‐operative LDFAs were 88.0° (range, 83–94°) and 88.0° (range, 80–96°) for the kinematic alignment group, and 88.2° (range, 83–95°) and 90.2° (range, 84–97°) for the mechanical alignment group. Mean pre‐ and post‐operative MPTAs were 86.0° (range, 78–93°) and 87.1° (range, 78–94°) for the kinematic alignment group and 86.4° (range, 77–94°) and 89.6° (range, 84–95°) for the mechanical alignment group. Mean pre‐ and post‐operative HKA angles were −3.3° (range, −24° to 24°) and −0.3° (range, −10° to 8°) for the kinematic alignment group and −6.9° (range, −25° to 7°) and −0.9° (range, −8° to 7°) for the mechanical alignment group. Conclusion Most systematic reviews and meta‐analyses that report outcomes of TKA using kinematic alignment do not distinguish between the different versions of kinematic alignment. The clinical studies included in systematic reviews are limited and inconsistent in their reporting of radiographic angles. Different alignment strategies are often grouped under the umbrella term of kinematic alignment, which contributes to conflicting reports, confusion and unresolved questions regarding the efficacy of true unrestricted kinematic alignment. Level of Evidence Level IV.

No Difference in Limb Alignment Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Kinematic Alignment May Reduce Opioid Consumption and Length of Stay Compared to Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty

Higher satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty using restricted inverse kinematic alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty reproduces more native rollback and laxity than mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: A matched pair cadaveric study

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is more advantageous for knees with severe deformity: a randomized controlled trial study design.

Restoration of the native tibial joint line obliquity in total knee arthroplasty with inverse kinematic alignment does not increase knee adduction moments

Modified kinematic alignment better restores plantar pressure distribution than mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

Better restoration of joint line obliquity in tibia first restricted kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment TKA

Systematic review and meta-analysis of long term outcomes and innovations in Total Knee Arthroplasty: KINEMATIC, PERSONALIZED KNEE vs. CONVENTIONAL

Comparison of the Radiologic, Morphometric, and Clinical Outcomes between Kinematically and Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Matching Study

Sparse and inconsistent reporting of pre‐ and post‐operative radiographic angles of total knee arthroplasty using true unrestricted kinematic alignment: An umbrella review and secondary meta‐analysis

Higher satisfaction and function scores in restricted kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment with medial pivot design total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomised controlled trial

Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a five-year prospective, multicentre, survivorship study

Inverse kinematic total knee arthroplasty using conventional instrumentation restores constitutional coronal alignment

Functional alignment maximises advantages of robotic arm‐assisted total knee arthroplasty with better patient‐reported outcomes compared to mechanical alignment

CT Validation of Intraoperative Implant Position and Knee Alignment as Determined by the MAKO Total Knee Arthroplasty System

Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Adjusted Restricted Kinematic Alignment for the Treatment of Severe Varus Deformity: Technical Note

Measuring Parallelism to the Ground in Bipedal Stance Phase: Mechanical Versus Kinematic Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Kinematic alignment recreates femoral trochlear geometry more closely than mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty

Preoperative evaluation of femoral and tibial sagittal alignment in robotic-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty and consequences for practice

Large multiplanar changes to native alignment have no apparent impact on clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty