Safety and Effectiveness of Robotic‐Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
Mingcheng Yuan,Tingxian Ling,Qiang Su,Xufeng Wan,Yahao Lai,Zongke Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14008
2024-02-27
Orthopaedic Surgery
Abstract:YUANHUA‐TKA is a semi‐active robotic arm system. This robotic arm‐assisted total knee arthroplasty (raTKA) system was authorized for clinical practice by the Chinese National Medical Products Administration in 2020. Compared with MAKO, YUANHUA‐TKA has several advantages. First, the robotic arm of YUANHUA‐TKA has a much smaller volume, which can save space in the operating room, giving the surgeons much more room to operate. Second, the robotic arm of YUANHUA‐TKA has one more axle than MAKO, providing a much more flexible operation. In terms of the cost, YUANHUA‐TKA not only has a much lower acquisition cost but also a lower operating cost because of the rigid driver, rather than the cable driver of MAKO. In this study, we investigated the safety and clinical effectiveness of raTKA using the YUANHUA‐TKA system. Objective We investigated the advantages of robotic arm‐assisted total knee arthroplasty (raTKA) over conventional manual TKA (cmTKA) by comprehensively comparing patients who received raTKA and cmTKA in terms of postoperative pain, function, imaging assessment, and trauma to the body. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of raTKA in patients using the YUANHUA‐TKA system. Methods In a prospective, randomized single‐blind trial, 60 patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA from October 2020 to December 2020 were randomly assigned to either raTKA or cmTKA. Clinical evaluation, including the time of osteotomy and prosthesis model testing, the total operation time, the visual analogue scale at rest, VAS in motion, opioid consumption, white blood cell count, neutrophil ratio, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C‐reactive protein (CRP), passive and active range of motion (pROM, aROM), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC [stiffness, pain, and function]) score, gait analysis, keen society score (KSS), adverse events, and blood loss were collected by the project nurse, as well as the imaging evaluation, including the lateral tibia component angle (LTC), frontal femoral component angle, frontal tibia component angle (FTC), lateral femoral component angl, and hip–knee–ankle angle (HKA). The student t‐test (or the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test) and the χ2‐test (or the Fisher exact test) were used to determine differences in categorical variables. Results No significant difference was found between the two groups in pain throughout the whole follow‐up period. On the third day postoperatively, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate in the cmTKA group was significantly higher (p = 0.02), as well as the CRP (p = 0.04). No significant difference was found in the WOMAC stiffnes score or pROM. However, the aROM and the flexion range when walking (FRW) were significantly better in the raTKA group throughout the trial (p
orthopedics