Abstract:BACKGROUND: The notion that neutral alignment is mandatory to assure long-term durability after TKA has been based mostly on short-film studies. However, this is challenged by recent long-film studies.QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We conducted this long-film study to know (1) whether the risk of aseptic revision for nontraumatic reasons was greater among knees with greater than 3° varus or valgus (defined as "outliers") than those that were aligned within 3° of neutral on long-standing mechanical axis (hip to knee) radiographs; and (2) what the failure mechanisms were and whether the malalignment was femoral or tibial in origin, or both, among those in the outlier group.METHODS: Between November 1998 and January 2009 we performed 1299 cemented, posterior cruciate ligament-substituting TKAs in 867 patients for primary osteoarthritis. We had inadequate long-standing radiographs to analyze postoperative alignment for 124 of those knees, and an additional 24 were excluded for prespecified reasons. Consequently, 1151 knees were enrolled in our study. Of these, 982 (85%) in 661 patients (620 women and 41 men) who had followup greater than 24 months were analyzed. The knees were divided according to whether the postoperative mechanical axis was neutral (0° ± 3°), varus (> 3°), or valgus (< -3°) alignment on long-standing radiographs. The survivorships free from aseptic revision for nontraumatic reasons were compared among groups. The mechanical femoral and the tibial component alignment (MFCA and MTCA, respectively) were investigated to know the origin of overall mechanical malalignment of the outlier knees. The mean duration of followup was 8 ± 4 years (range, 2-17 years). Thirty-five knees (4%) showed aseptic loosening at 7 ± 4 years (range, 0.1-14 years) and five (1%) showed polyethylene wear at 12 ± 1 years (range, 10-13 years). Tibial loosening (73%) was the most common reason for aseptic revision followed by femoral loosening (30%). Of this cohort, 687 (70%), 250 (25%), and 45 (5%) knees had overall mechanical neutral, varus, and valgus alignment, respectively. Factors associated with the risk of aseptic revision were identified by Cox regression.RESULTS: The varus outliers (but not the valgus outliers) failed more often than the neutral knees (10% [25 of 250] versus 2% [13 of 687]; odds ratio [OR], 5.8, 95% CI, 2.9-11.5; p < 0.001). Ten-year survivorship free from aseptic revision was lower among varus outliers than among knees with neutral alignment (87% [95% CI, 80%-93%] versus 98% [95% CI, 97%-99%]; p = 0.001). Femoral component varus malpositioning was the main origin of the varus outliers (MFCA = 4.2° ± 2.0°; MTCA = 0.9° ± 1.7°) and was a risk factor for aseptic revision compared with neutral femoral positioning (OR, 14.0; 95% CI, 1.9-105.6; p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS: This long-film study corresponds to previous short-film studies for the notion that varus malalignment is associated with inferior long-term implant survivorship. Although aseptic loosening occurred most commonly on the tibial side, the primary origin of the overall varus malalignment was femoral component varus malpositioning. Aiming for neutral alignment in TKA still seems to be a reasonable strategy in clinical practice.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Widening of tibial resection boundaries increases the rate of femoral component valgus and internal rotation in functionally aligned TKA

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Ranawat II Valgus Deformity with Enlarged Femoral Valgus Cut Angle: A New Technique to Achieve Balanced Gap.

Is There a Gold Standard for TKA Tibial Component Rotational Alignment?

Aligning the tibial component with medial border of the tibial tubercle--is it always right?

Effect of tibia‐first, restricted functional alignment technique on gap width changes, and component positioning in robotic arm‐assisted total knee arthroplasty

Restoration of the native tibial joint line obliquity in total knee arthroplasty with inverse kinematic alignment does not increase knee adduction moments

Boundaries in Kinematic Alignment: Why, When, and How

Alignment Strategies in Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Rise and Role of Enabling Technology

Alignment is only part of the equation: High variability in soft tissue distractibility in the varus knee undergoing primary TKA

Higher satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty using restricted inverse kinematic alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment

A Restricted Functional Balancing Technique for Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Varus Deformity: Does a Medial Soft-Tissue Release Result in a Worse Outcome?

Maintaining the Physiological Lateral Flexion Gap in the Kinematically Aligned TKA Does Not Compromise Clinical Outcomes at One-Year Follow-Up

Inverse kinematic alignment accommodates native coronal knee alignment better in comparison to adjusted mechanical alignment and restricted kinematic alignment

Addressing sagittal plane imbalance in primary total knee arthroplasty

Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Adjusted Restricted Kinematic Alignment for the Treatment of Severe Varus Deformity: Technical Note

Risk of tibial baseplate loosening is low in patients following unrestricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty using a cruciate‐retaining medial conforming insert: A study using radiostereometric analysis at 2 years

Femoral Component Varus Malposition is Associated with Tibial Aseptic Loosening After TKA

Effect of Individual Distal Femoral Valgus Resection in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Patients with Valgus Knee: A Retrospective Cohort Study

True Confessions of Neutral Mechanical Disciple-How I Learned to Love a Patient-Specific Target

Alignment in TKA: what has been clear is not anymore!

Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Avoid Crossing Over From Varus to Valgus