Abstract:Abstract Purpose Various alignment philosophies for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been described, all striving to achieve excellent long-term implant survival and good functional outcomes. In recent years, in search of higher functionality and patient satisfaction, a shift towards more tailored and patient-specific alignment is seen. The purpose of this study was to describe a restricted ‘inverse kinematic alignment’ (iKA) technique, and to compare clinical outcomes of patients that underwent robotic-assisted TKA performed by restricted iKA vs. adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA). Methods The authors reviewed the records of a consecutive series of patients that received robotic-assisted TKA with restricted iKA ( n = 40) and with aMA ( n = 40). Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and satisfaction on a visual analogue scale (VAS) were collected at a follow-up of 12 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds, and uni- and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine associations of OKS and satisfaction with six variables (age, sex, body mass index (BMI), preoperative hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle, preoperative OKS, alignment technique). Results The restricted iKA and aMA techniques yielded comparable outcome scores ( p = 0.069), with OKS, respectively, 44.6 ± 3.5 and 42.2 ± 6.3. VAS Satisfaction was better ( p = 0.012) with restricted iKA (9.2 ± 0.8) compared to aMA (8.5 ± 1.3). The number of patients that achieved OKS and satisfaction PASS thresholds was significantly higher ( p = 0.049 and p = 0.003, respectively) using restricted iKA (98% and 80%) compared to aMA (85% and 48%). Knees with preoperative varus deformity, achieved significantly ( p = 0.025) better OKS using restricted iKA (45.4 ± 2.0) compared to aMA (41.4 ± 6.8). Multivariable analyses confirmed better OKS ( β = 3.1; p = 0.007) and satisfaction ( β = 0.73; p = 0.005) with restricted iKA. Conclusions The results of this study suggest that restricted iKA and aMA grant comparable clinical outcomes at 12-month follow-up, though a greater proportion of knees operated by restricted iKA achieved the PASS thresholds for OKS and satisfaction. Notably. in knees with preoperative varus deformity, restricted iKA yielded significantly better OKS and satisfaction than aMA. Level of evidence Level III, comparative study.

Effect of tibia‐first, restricted functional alignment technique on gap width changes, and component positioning in robotic arm‐assisted total knee arthroplasty

A new gap balancing technique with functional alignment in total knee arthroplasty using the MAKO robotic arm system: a preliminary study

Functional alignment maximises advantages of robotic arm‐assisted total knee arthroplasty with better patient‐reported outcomes compared to mechanical alignment

High three‐dimensional accuracy of component placement and lower limb alignment using a robotic arm‐assisted system and gap‐balancing instrument in total knee arthroplasty

Functionally aligned total knee arthroplasty: A lateral flexion laxity up to 6 mm is safe!

Patient-specific instrumentation combined with a new tool for gap balancing is useful in total knee replacement: a 3-year follow-up of a retrospective study

The Effects of Surgical Technique in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Varus Osteoarthritic Knee on the Rotational Alignment of Femoral Component: Gap Balancing Technique versus Measured Resection Technique

Widening of tibial resection boundaries increases the rate of femoral component valgus and internal rotation in functionally aligned TKA

Maintaining the Physiological Lateral Flexion Gap in the Kinematically Aligned TKA Does Not Compromise Clinical Outcomes at One-Year Follow-Up

Addressing sagittal plane imbalance in primary total knee arthroplasty

Effect of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Resection on Gap Balancing in Robot‐assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Enhancing soft tissue balance: Evaluating robotic‐assisted functional positioning in varus knees across flexion and extension with quantitative sensor‐guided technology

Accuracy of total knee arthroplasty using the modified gap technique based on the bone gap: an evaluation of the bone gap with a distal femoral trial component

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is more advantageous for knees with severe deformity: a randomized controlled trial study design.

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Ranawat II Valgus Deformity with Enlarged Femoral Valgus Cut Angle: A New Technique to Achieve Balanced Gap.

Comparison of postoperative clinical outcomes and knee stability of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty using the tibia-first gap navigation technique with a computer-aided system and measured-resection technique: A retrospective analysis of a propensity-matched cohort

Tibia‐first, gap‐balanced patient‐specific alignment technique achieves well‐balanced gaps in 90% of cases by rebuilding bony anatomy within boundaries

Restricted kinematic alignment achieves similar relative lateral laxity and greater joint line obliquity compared to gap balancing TKA

Preoperative evaluation of femoral and tibial sagittal alignment in robotic-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty and consequences for practice

Real-world accuracy of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty and its impact on expedited recovery

Higher satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty using restricted inverse kinematic alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment