Alignment is only part of the equation: High variability in soft tissue distractibility in the varus knee undergoing primary TKA

Matthew J. Grosso,Edgar A. Wakelin,Christopher Plaskos,Gwo‐Chin Lee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12115
2024-03-17
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the in vivo medial and lateral joint laxities across various total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alignment categories correlated to (1) hip–knee–ankle angle, (2) proximal tibial angle and (3) distal femoral angle in a consecutive group of patients undergoing robotic‐assisted TKA. Methods Using ligament tensions acquired during 805 robotic‐assisted TKA with a dynamic ligament tensor under a load of 70–90 N, the relationship between medial and lateral collateral ligament laxity and overall limb alignment was established. Only knees with neutral or mechanical varus alignment were included and divided into five groups: neutral (0°–3°), varus 3°–5°, varus 6°–9°, varus 10°–13° and varus ≥14°. Groups were further subdivided by the intraoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA). The distraction of the medial and lateral sides was compared across the various alignments using an analysis of variance. Results The ability to distract the medial collateral ligament in extension and flexion was proportional to the degree of varus deformity, increasing from 4.0 ± 2.3 mm in the neutral group to 8.7 ± 3.2 mm in the varus ≥14° group (p
surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?