Abstract:IntroductionEven in a well-aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA), limb rotation at the time of radiographic assessment will alter the measurement of alignment. This could influence the radiographic outcome of TKA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment after TKA and to establish a re-calculation of this rotation by using existing radiographic landmarks.Materials and methodsSynthetic femur and tibia (Sawbones®, Inc. Vashon Island, WA) were used to create a TKA of the Triathlon® knee prosthesis system (Stryker®, Limerick, Ireland). The femoral alignment was 6.5° valgus. The model was fixed in an upright stand. Five series of nine anteroposterior (AP) long leg radiographs were taken on a 30 cm × 120 cm plates in full extension with the limb rotated, in 5° increments, from 20° external rotation to 20° internal rotation. After digitizing each radiograph (Scanner Hewlett Packard XJ 527), an observer measured the anatomic mechanical angle of the femur [AMA (°)], the mechanical lateral proximal femur angle [mLPFA (°)], the mechanical lateral distal femur angle [mLDFA (°)], the mechanical medial proximal tibia angle [mMPTA (°)] and the mechanical lateral distal tibia angle [mLDTA (°)] using a digital measurement software (MediCAD®, Hectec, Altfraunhofen, Germany). Besides, the observer measured the geometrical distances of the femoral component figured on the long leg radiograph. A ratio of one distance to another was measured (called femoral component distance ratio).ResultsThe average radiographic anatomic alignment ranged from 6.827° AMA (SD = 0.22°) in 20° internal rotation to 4.627° AMA (SD = 0.22°) in 20° external rotation. Average mLPFA (°) ranged from 101.63° (SD = 0.63) in 20° internal rotation to 93.60° (SD = 0.74°) in 20° external rotation. Average mLDFA (°) ranged from 90.59° (SD = 3.01°) in 20° internal rotation to 86.76° (SD = 0.36°) in 20° external rotation. Average mMPTA (°) ranged from 90.35° (SD = 0.81°) in 20° internal rotation to 88.49° (SD = 0.52°) in 20° external rotation. Average mLDTA (°) ranged from 98.89° (SD = 2.3°) in 20° internal rotation to 90.53° (SD = 3.39°) in 20° external rotation. Without an application of limb rotation, the femoral component distance ratio was measured to be 0.89 (SD = 0.01), in 20° internal rotation 0.63 (SD = 0.01) and in 20° external rotation 1.16 (SD = 0.01).DiscussionLimb rotation had a highly statistically significant effect on measured anatomic alignment and mechanical angles. A correlation between limb rotation, anatomic mechanical angle, mechanical angles measured at femur and tibia and the femoral component distance ratio was established. As the anatomic mechanical angle and the femoral component distance ratio change linearly in the range of 20° internal and external limb rotation, a calculation of the femoral component distance ratio could be used to re-calculate the limb rotation at the time of radiographic assessment to evaluate the evidence of a long leg radiograph.

The role of limb alignment on natural tibiofemoral kinematics and kinetics

Correlation Between Preoperative and Postoperative Alignment and Kinematic Gait in Total Knee Arthroplasty

The coronal inclination of the medial tibial plateau affects coronal gait kinematics for varus osteoarthritic knees

Kinematic alignment adequately restores trochlear anatomy, patellar kinematics and kinetics in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review

Are changes in radiological leg alignment and femoral parameters after total hip replacement responsible for joint loading during gait?

Measurement of femoral posterior condylar offset and posterior tibial slope in normal knees based on 3D reconstruction

The Influence of Kinematic Alignment on Patellofemoral Joint Biomechanics in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Neutral alignment resulting from tibial vara and opposite femoral valgus is the main morphologic pattern in healthy middle-aged patients: an exploration of a 3D-CT database

Influence of lower limb rotation in navigated alignment analysis: implications for high tibial osteotomies

The significance of frontal plane static alignment in anticipating dynamic knee moment among transtibial prosthesis users: A cross-sectional study

Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Avoid Crossing Over From Varus to Valgus

[Rationale of kinematic alignment]

An MRI-Based Correlation Study Investigating the Effect of Varying Posterior Femoral Condyle Angles on the Patellofemoral Joint

Functional knee phenotypes: a novel classification for phenotyping the coronal lower limb alignment based on the native alignment in young non-osteoarthritic patients

Restoration of the native tibial joint line obliquity in total knee arthroplasty with inverse kinematic alignment does not increase knee adduction moments

Compensatory mechanisms for proximal & distal joint alignment & gait in varus knee osteoarthritis treated with high tibial osteotomy: A systematic review

Dynamic loading of the knee and hip joint and compensatory strategies in children and adolescents with varus malalignment

Femoral lateral bowing and varus condylar orientation are prevalent and affect axial alignment of TKA in Koreans

Effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties

Measuring Parallelism to the Ground in Bipedal Stance Phase: Mechanical Versus Kinematic Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Increased Femoral Anteversion Does Not Lead to Increased Joint Forces During Gait in a Cohort of Adolescent Patients