Recent advances in the management of myelofibrosis.

R. Mesa

2016-08-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The Influence of Kinematic Alignment on Patellofemoral Joint Biomechanics in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Johanna-Maria Simon,Leandra Bauer,Christoph Thorwächter,Matthias Woiczinski,Florian Simon,Peter E. Müller,Boris M. Holzapfel,Thomas R. Niethammer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226894

IF: 3.9

2024-11-23

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:Background: Anterior knee pain is a prevalent issue post total knee arthroplasty, often necessitating revision surgery. Various factors contribute to this complication, including patellar maltracking and excessive patellofemoral load. Kinematic alignment has emerged as an alternative, showing promising outcomes in clinical studies. However, its impact on patellofemoral biomechanics needs to be more adequately understood. This study compared the effects of kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty on patellofemoral joint biomechanics. Methods: Eight fresh-frozen human knee specimens underwent biomechanical testing in a knee rig setup, performing an active weight-loaded knee joint flexion of 30–130°. After the testing of native kinematics, kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty was performed using a medial pivot implant design without patellar resurfacing. Quadriceps force, retropatellar peak pressure and the retropatellar contact area were measured during knee flexion using a patellar pressure-sensitive film. Patella kinematics (shift and tilt) was tracked using an optoelectrical measurement system. Functional regressions were used to determine the influence of the alignment on the kinematics and loading of the knee joint. Results: Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty resulted in reduced quadriceps force during knee flexion compared to mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Retropatellar peak pressure, retropatellar contact area and patella kinematics did not vary between the alignments. Conclusions: Kinematic alignment offers potential benefits in reducing quadriceps force during knee flexion, which may mitigate anterior knee pain risk. Further research is needed to elucidate its effects in varying anatomical conditions and alignment strategies.

medicine, general & internal
Kinematic alignment recreates femoral trochlear geometry more closely than mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty

Ilya Borukhov,Petros Ismailidis,Christina I. Esposito,Sally LiArno,Jenna Lyon,Peter J. McEwen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.106b8.bjj-2023-1209.r1

2024-08-01

The Bone & Joint Journal

Abstract:Aims This study aimed to evaluate if total knee arthroplasty (TKA) femoral components aligned in either mechanical alignment (MA) or kinematic alignment (KA) are more biomimetic concerning trochlear sulcus orientation and restoration of trochlear height. Methods Bone surfaces from 1,012 CT scans of non-arthritic femora were segmented using a modelling and analytics system. TKA femoral components (Triathlon; Stryker) were virtually implanted in both MA and KA. Trochlear sulcus orientation was assessed by measuring the distal trochlear sulcus angle (DTSA) in native femora and in KA and MA prosthetic femoral components. Trochlear anatomy restoration was evaluated by measuring the differences in medial, lateral, and sulcus trochlear height between native femora and KA and MA prosthetic femoral components. Results Femoral components in both MA and KA alignments exhibited a more valgus DTSA compared to native femora. However, DTSA deviation from native was significantly less in KA than in MA (4.8° (SD 2.2°) vs 8.8° (SD 1.8°); p < 0.001). DTSA deviation from native orientation correlated positively with the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) in KA and negatively in MA (r = 0.53, p < 0.001; r = -0.18, p < 0.001). Medial trochlear height was not restored with either MA or KA, with MA resulting in lower medial trochlear height than KA in the proximal 20% of the trochlea. Lateral and sulcus trochlear height was not restored with either alignment in the proximal 80% of the trochlea. At the terminal arc point, KA replicated sulcus and lateral trochlear height, while MA led to over-restoration. Conclusion Femoral components aligned in KA demonstrated greater biomimetic qualities than those in MA regarding trochlear sulcus orientation and trochlear height restoration, particularly in valgus femora. Variability across knees was observed, warranting further research to evaluate the clinical implications of these findings. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(8):817–825.

surgery,orthopedics
Does inverse kinematic alignment coupled with robot-assisted TKA optimize patellofemoral clinical and radiological results?

Vincent Genestoux,Pierre-Henri Vermorel,Thomas Neri,Frédéric Farizon,Rémi Philippot

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103880

2024-04-05

Abstract:Introduction: With a satisfaction rate of 80%, Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) surgery has seen significant improvements in recent decades. The 20% of poor results may be explained by the alignment technique used for implant placement, which can influence patellofemoral kinematics. The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the use of inverse kinematic alignment makes it possible to obtain satisfactory clinical and radiological patellar scores in robotic TKA. Hypothesis: The inverse kinematic alignment technique coupled with robotic surgery makes it possible to restore the native kinematics of the patella. Materials and methods: This prospective study including 100 TKAs with a primary TKA performed using the Stryker MakoTM robotic surgery system, and the inverse kinematic alignment technique. Patients who underwent patella resurfacing were excluded. Clinical and radiological scores were recorded preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Results: At one year, the specific patellar clinical scores were excellent with an average Kujala score of 85.69 and an average HSS Patellar score 88.15. The average patellar lateralization index was 0.15 and the average patellar tilt was 5.1°, showing no significant difference compared to pre-operation (p=0.45 and p=0.18). The average external rotation of the femoral implant was 0.47±0.6°[-1.9; 2.1]. Discussion: The patellofemoral clinical results were excellent. The use of the robotic arm coupled with this alignment technique makes it possible to obtain a controlled external rotation of the femoral implant as well as an optimized orientation of the tibial component, favoring good restitution of the alignment of the extensor apparatus. This study did not demonstrate any radiological correction of patellar tilt and lateralization. Conclusion: The combined use of robotic surgery with the inverse kinematic alignment technique seems effective on specific clinical results of the patellofemoral joint. Level of evidence: II; Prospective cohort.

surgery,orthopedics
Skin torture.

H. B. Routh,L. Parish,Samanta La Sen,B. Bhowmik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2004.09.002

Clinical Dermatology

Abstract:
Sparse and inconsistent reporting of pre‐ and post‐operative radiographic angles of total knee arthroplasty using true unrestricted kinematic alignment: An umbrella review and secondary meta‐analysis

Mo Saffarini,Robin Canetti,Julien Henry,Kinga Michalewska,Jacobus H. Müller,Michael T. Hirschmann,European Knee Associates (EKA)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12494

2024-10-28

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy

Abstract:Purpose To identify, synthesise and critically appraise findings of systematic reviews and meta‐analyses on pre‐ and post‐operative radiographic angles (lateral distal femoral angle [LDFA], medial proximal tibial angle [MPTA] and hip–knee–ankle [HKA] angle) of unrestricted kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods Two authors searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Epistemonikos for systematic reviews, with or without meta‐analyses, that reported on TKA outcomes using unrestricted kinematic alignment. The methodological quality of the included systematic reviews and meta‐analyses was independently assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR‐2). The effect size with its 95% confidence interval (CI) for radiographic angles was extracted from the systematic reviews and meta‐analyses. The characteristics of clinical studies included in systematic reviews were listed and tabulated. Pre‐ and post‐operative MPTA, LDFA and HKA angles were summarised using meta‐analytic random‐effects models. Results Nineteen records were eligible for data extraction. Systematic reviews and meta‐analyses included 44 clinical studies, of which 31 were on unrestricted kinematic alignment and 13 were on restricted versions of kinematic alignment. None of the included systematic reviews or meta‐analyses fulfiled all seven critical AMSTAR‐2 domains. Few comparative studies reported both pre‐ and post‐operative angles (LDFA, n = 3; MPTA, n = 4; and HKA angle, n = 10). Mean pre‐ and post‐operative LDFAs were 88.0° (range, 83–94°) and 88.0° (range, 80–96°) for the kinematic alignment group, and 88.2° (range, 83–95°) and 90.2° (range, 84–97°) for the mechanical alignment group. Mean pre‐ and post‐operative MPTAs were 86.0° (range, 78–93°) and 87.1° (range, 78–94°) for the kinematic alignment group and 86.4° (range, 77–94°) and 89.6° (range, 84–95°) for the mechanical alignment group. Mean pre‐ and post‐operative HKA angles were −3.3° (range, −24° to 24°) and −0.3° (range, −10° to 8°) for the kinematic alignment group and −6.9° (range, −25° to 7°) and −0.9° (range, −8° to 7°) for the mechanical alignment group. Conclusion Most systematic reviews and meta‐analyses that report outcomes of TKA using kinematic alignment do not distinguish between the different versions of kinematic alignment. The clinical studies included in systematic reviews are limited and inconsistent in their reporting of radiographic angles. Different alignment strategies are often grouped under the umbrella term of kinematic alignment, which contributes to conflicting reports, confusion and unresolved questions regarding the efficacy of true unrestricted kinematic alignment. Level of Evidence Level IV.

surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
The effect of different alignment strategies on trochlear orientation after total knee arthroplasty

Antonio Klasan,Victoria Anelli‐Monti,Sven E. Putnis,Thomas Neri,Christian Kammerlander

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12178

2024-04-14

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy

Abstract:Purpose When planning and delivering total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there are multiple coronal alignment strategies such as functional alignment (FA), kinematic alignment (KA), mechanical and adjusted mechanical alignment (MA, aMA). Recent three‐dimensional and robotic‐assisted surgery (RAS) studies have demonstrated that KA potentially better restores the trochlear anatomy than MA. The purpose of this study was to compare the restoration of the native trochlear orientation in patients undergoing RAS TKA using four different alignment strategies. It was hypothesised that FA would result in the lowest number of outliers. Methods This is a prospective study of 200 patients undergoing RAS‐TKA with a single implant. All patients were analysed for MA and KA prebalancing, and 157 patients received aMA and 43 patients FA with intraoperative balancing. Preoperative transverse computed tomography scans were used to determine the posterior condylar axis (PCA), lateral trochlear inclination (LTI) angle, sulcus angle (SA) and anterior trochlear line (ATL) angle. Implant measurements were obtained using a photographic analysis. Intraoperative software data combined with implant data and preoperative measurements were used to calculate the differences. Outliers were defined as ≥3° of alteration. Trochlea dysplasia was defined as LTI

surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
Personalized alignment techniques better restore the native trochlear groove compared to systematic alignment techniques in total knee arthroplasty

Alexander D. Orsi,Jobe Shatrov,Christopher Plaskos,Stefan Kreuzer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12104

2024-03-02

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy

Abstract:Purpose The relationship between constitutional coronal alignment and implant positioning on trochlear groove restoration in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is poorly understood. This study aimed to determine whether the choice of alignment philosophy significantly affects the restoration of the trochlea groove. Methods Sixty‐one imageless robotic TKAs performed by a single orthopaedic surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. In each case, the entire native trochlea was digitized to generate the native femoral anatomy, and implants were planned according to a functional alignment (FA) technique. Final implant position was recorded using the validated bone resection planes from the navigation system. Simulated femoral component positions were generated according to previously described alignment techniques: mechanical alignment (MA), gap balancing (GB), kinematic alignment (KA), restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) and restricted inverse kinematic alignment (riKA). Trochlear angle (TA), trochlear under/overstuffing and mediolateral sulcus offset were compared between the six simulated alignment techniques, as well as the final implanted technique. Further analyses investigated the effect of preoperative coronal alignment on trochlear position. Comparisons were assessed with an analysis of variance and Welch's t‐tests or Wilcoxon's rank‐sum tests with Bonferroni corrections. Results The implanted and simulated techniques all resulted in greater TA valgus compared to the native groove (p 0.001). All alignment philosophies understuffed the native trochlea groove. KA and rKA understuffed less than all other techniques (p

surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
Analysis of angular spread characteristics of mobile radio wave dispersion through foliage

H. V. Le,J. Takada,M. Ghoraishi,C. Phakasoum,K. Kitao,T. Imai

2012-12-31

Abstract:In this paper, the effect of the foliage on the radio wave propagation has been analyzed by using the SAGE algorithm. It has been shown that the estimates given by SAGE algorithm agree well with the geometry of the measurement site. The analysis results show that the azimuth direction spread for V polarization is always more than that for H polarization, and the opposite is true in the case of co-elevation direction spread. The average azimuth direction spread was found to be about 25° and the average co-elevation direction spread was about 6°.
Radiative kaon decays K+/---> pi +/- pi 0 gamma and direct CP violation.

Cheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.49.3771

1993-08-02

Abstract:It is stressed that a measurement of the electric dipole amplitude for direct photon emission in $\kpm$ decays through its interference with inner bremsstrahlung is important for differentiating among various models. Effects of amplitude CP violation in the radiative decays of the charged kaon are analyzed in the Standard Model in conjunction with the large $N_c$ approach. We point out that gluon and electromagnetic penguin contributions to the CP-violating asymmetry between the Dalitz plots of $\kpm$ are of equal weight. The magnitude of CP asymmetry ranges from $2\times 10^{-6}$ to $1\times 10^{-5}$ when the photon energy in the kaon rest frame varies from 50 MeV to 170 MeV.
Boundaries in Kinematic Alignment: Why, When, and How

Pier Francesco Indelli,Giuseppe Petralia,Stefano Ghirardelli,Pieralberto Valpiana,Giuseppe Aloisi,Andrea Giordano Salvi,Salvatore Risitano

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2395-6935

2024-09-14

The Journal of Knee Surgery

Abstract:The use of alternative alignments in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has recently been increasing in popularity: many of these alignments have been included in the broad spectrum of "kinematic alignment." This alternative approach was recommended to increase patients' satisfaction since many studies based on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) showed that every fifth patient is not satisfied with the surgical outcome. In fact, the original kinematic alignment technique was designed as a "pure resurfacing" technique, maintaining the preoperative axes (flexion–extension and axial rotation) of the knee. In adjunct, many new classifications of the preoperative limb deformity have been proposed to include a large range of knee anatomies, few of them very atypical. Following those classifications, many surgeons aimed for a reproduction of unusual anatomies putting in jeopardy the survivorship of the implant according to the classical "dogma" of a poor knee kinematics and TKA biomechanics if the final hip–knee–ankle (HKA) axis was not kept within 5 degrees from neutral. This article reviews the literature supporting the choice of setting alignment boundaries in TKA when surgeons are interested in reproducing the constitutional knee anatomy of the patient within a safe range. Received: 16 June 2024 Accepted: 19 August 2024 Accepted Manuscript online: 20 August 2024 Article published online: 12 September 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

orthopedics
Systematic review and meta-analysis of long term outcomes and innovations in Total Knee Arthroplasty: KINEMATIC, PERSONALIZED KNEE vs. CONVENTIONAL

Zaki Alhifzi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.122318

2024-08-29

Abstract:Background: Kinematic alignment is an emerging approach for total knee arthroplasty, with the aim to restore patient's individual pre-arthritic joint kinematics. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we compared the kinematic alignment with the conventional mechanical alignment for total knee arthroplasty. Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus on June 2, 2024. We screened the retrieved studies for eligibility. Then extracted the data from the included studies, and then pooled the data as mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval using Review Manager Software (ver. 3.5). Results: There was no significant difference between KA and MA in the different reported scores: combined KSS score at 6 months (P = 0.23) and 1 years (P = 0.60), KSS Patient satisfaction (P = 0.33), KSS function score (P = 0.07), Oxford score at 6 months (P = 0.45) and 2 years (P = 0.41), KOOS score (P = 0.26). Moreover, there was statistically significant difference in range of motion for flexion and extension at 1 and 2 years, incision length, the length of hospital stay, or the duration of surgery. Conclusion: Although kinematic alignment showed slightly better clinical outcomes than mechanical alignment, the difference between the two techniques is not statistically significant.
Higher satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty using restricted inverse kinematic alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment

Philip Winnock de Grave,Thomas Luyckx,Kurt Claeys,Thomas Tampere,Jonas Kellens,Jacobus Müller,Paul Gunst

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06165-4

2020-07-31

Abstract:Abstract Purpose Various alignment philosophies for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been described, all striving to achieve excellent long-term implant survival and good functional outcomes. In recent years, in search of higher functionality and patient satisfaction, a shift towards more tailored and patient-specific alignment is seen. The purpose of this study was to describe a restricted ‘inverse kinematic alignment’ (iKA) technique, and to compare clinical outcomes of patients that underwent robotic-assisted TKA performed by restricted iKA vs. adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA). Methods The authors reviewed the records of a consecutive series of patients that received robotic-assisted TKA with restricted iKA ( n = 40) and with aMA ( n = 40). Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and satisfaction on a visual analogue scale (VAS) were collected at a follow-up of 12 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds, and uni- and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine associations of OKS and satisfaction with six variables (age, sex, body mass index (BMI), preoperative hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle, preoperative OKS, alignment technique). Results The restricted iKA and aMA techniques yielded comparable outcome scores ( p = 0.069), with OKS, respectively, 44.6 ± 3.5 and 42.2 ± 6.3. VAS Satisfaction was better ( p = 0.012) with restricted iKA (9.2 ± 0.8) compared to aMA (8.5 ± 1.3). The number of patients that achieved OKS and satisfaction PASS thresholds was significantly higher ( p = 0.049 and p = 0.003, respectively) using restricted iKA (98% and 80%) compared to aMA (85% and 48%). Knees with preoperative varus deformity, achieved significantly ( p = 0.025) better OKS using restricted iKA (45.4 ± 2.0) compared to aMA (41.4 ± 6.8). Multivariable analyses confirmed better OKS ( β = 3.1; p = 0.007) and satisfaction ( β = 0.73; p = 0.005) with restricted iKA. Conclusions The results of this study suggest that restricted iKA and aMA grant comparable clinical outcomes at 12-month follow-up, though a greater proportion of knees operated by restricted iKA achieved the PASS thresholds for OKS and satisfaction. Notably. in knees with preoperative varus deformity, restricted iKA yielded significantly better OKS and satisfaction than aMA. Level of evidence Level III, comparative study.

surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
Superiority of kinematic alignment over mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty during medium‐ to long‐term follow‐up: A meta‐analysis and trial sequential analysis

Guiguan Wang,Long Chen,Fenqi Luo,Jun Luo,Jie Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12093

2024-03-17

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy

Abstract:Purpose To compare and determine the reliability and conclusiveness of the medium‐ and long‐term efficacy in terms of patient‐reported outcome measures and the risk of revisions or reoperations (RRRs) of kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) in total knee arthroplasty. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Database Library to identify relevant literature. Only randomised clinical trials (RCTs) published before July 2023 were included. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and RRR were compared. Additionally, OKS and RRR were subjected to a trial sequential analysis. Results Seven RCTs involving 572 knees were identified. The pooled analysis of the included studies demonstrated that KA showed better medium‐term WOMAC and OKS (mean difference [MD] = −6.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −9.52 to −2.99, p

surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
Inverse kinematic total knee arthroplasty using conventional instrumentation restores constitutional coronal alignment

Sarah Keyes,Shane P. Russell,Zsolt Bertalan,James A. Harty

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12306

2024-06-04

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy

Abstract:Purpose Restricted inverse kinematic alignment (iKA) is a contemporary alignment strategy for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), commonly performed with robotic assistance. While superior clinical results are reported for kinematic‐type alignment strategies, registry data indicate no survivorship benefit for navigation or robotic assistance. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of an instrumented, restricted iKA technique for achieving patient‐specific alignment. Methods Seventy‐nine patients undergoing 84 TKAs (five bilateral procedures) using an iKA technique were included for preoperative and postoperative lower limb alignment analysis. The mean age was 66.5 (range: 43–82) with 33 male and 51 female patients. Artificial intelligence was employed for radiographic measurements. Alignment profiles were classified using the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) system. Preoperative and postoperative alignment profiles were compared with subanalyses for preoperative valgus, neutral and varus profiles. Results The mean joint‐line convergence angle (JLCA) reduced from 2.5° to −0.1° postoperatively. The mean lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) remained unchanged postoperatively, while the mean medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) increased by 2.5° (p = 0.001). By preservation of the LDFA and restoration of the MPTA, the mean hip knee ankle angle (HKA) moved through 3.5° varus to 1.2° valgus. The CPAK system was used to visually depict changes in alignment profiles for preoperative valgus, neutral and varus knees; with 63% of patients observing an interval change in classification. Conclusion Encouraged by the latest evidence supporting both conventional instrumentation and kinematic‐type TKA strategies, this study describes how a restricted, conventionally instrumented iKA technique may be utilised to restore constitutional lower limb alignment. Level of Evidence Level III.

surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: What is the optimal alignment correction to achieve success? The role of kinematic alignment

Peter McEwen,Abbas Omar,Takafumi Hiranaka

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100334

2024-10-16

Abstract:Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is in many ways the ultimate kinematic operation, as the express aim is to resurface the diseased side of the joint and restore pre-arthritic alignment and balance while maintaining integrity of both cruciate ligaments. An increasing body of knowledge relates the outcomes of UKA to pre-arthritic anatomy rather than an arbitrarily defined neutral. The Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification provides a validated technique for calculating pre-arthritic limb alignment (the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA)) and joint line obliquity (JLO) and will enable a greater understanding of the interactions between pre-arthritic anatomy, choice of prosthetic position and outcomes. When pre-arthritic alignment is not taken into consideration a post-operative limb alignment of mild to moderate varus for medial UKA and moderate valgus for lateral UKA appears to produce the best outcomes. When pre-arthritic anatomy is taken into account, superior results have been reported with restoration of pre-arthritic limb alignment and joint line obliquity. Restriction boundaries have yet to be clearly defined for tibial component coronal and hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angles when applying this new paradigm, but existing evidence would suggest a 6° varus limit for the tibial coronal angle may be a reasonable starting point. Lateral UKA has inherent differences in terms of tibial component positioning and ligament balance targets. Mobile bearing UKA demands a three-dimensional understanding of the effect of implant position on bearing stability. Modification of technique is necessary to produce anatomic tibia component angles with equipment designed for mechanical alignment. Robotic technology allows accurate understanding of pre-arthritic anatomy, precise reproduction of patient specific virtual planning, equally precise manipulation of soft tissue balance, and future research using these platforms is likely to further clarify in terms of ideal patient-specific component and limb alignment targets.
Hydrophobic characteristics of folded proteins.

P. Ponnuswamy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6107(93)90007-7

IF: 4.799

Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology

Abstract:
Large multiplanar changes to native alignment have no apparent impact on clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty

Payam Tarassoli,Jonathan M. Warnock,Yoong Ping Lim,Ishaan Jagota,David Parker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12044

2024-02-01

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy

Abstract:Purpose This study sought to examine if achieved postoperative alignment when compared to the native anatomy would lead to a difference in Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), and whether the achieved alignment could be broadly categorised by an accepted alignment strategy. Methods A retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data on patients undergoing single primary or bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was carried out. CT scans were used to determine the mean change ("delta values") between the pre and postoperative; hip‐knee‐ankle angle, lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle and femoral implant rotation. Femoral implant flexion and tibial implant slope were measured postoperatively. The primary outcome was the relationship of the variables to the change in KOOS pain subscale after one year. The secondary outcome was the number of knees which could be categorised postoperatively to an alignment strategy, and the mean PROMs in each cohort. Results A total of 296 knees in 261 patients were available for analysis. With regards to the primary outcome, the delta values for each variable did not demonstrate any association with the change in knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) pain score. Approximately 46% of knees could not be categorised to an alignment strategy based on postoperatively measured alignment, with no significant difference between each cohort with regards to the change in KOOS Pain score. Conclusion Achieved alignment does not consistently match accepted alignment strategies, and appears to confer no benefit to clinical outcomes when the native anatomy is most closely approximated, nor results in poorer outcomes in outliers. This study highlights the importance of routine three dimensional pre and postoperative imaging in clinical practice and for the valid analysis of outcomes in studies on alignment. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.

surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
No Difference in Limb Alignment Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Theofilos Karasavvidis,Cale A. Pagan,Eytan Debbi,David J. Mayman,Seth A. Jerabek,Jonathan M. Vigdorchik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.050

IF: 4.435

2024-03-28

The Journal of Arthroplasty

Abstract:Background Individualized alignment techniques have gained major interest in an effort to increase satisfaction among total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. This study aimed to compare postoperative alignment between kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) and assess whether KA significantly deviates from the principle of aligning the limb as close to neutral alignment as possible. Methods There were 234 patients who underwent robotic-assisted TKA using an unrestricted KA and a strict MA technique (KA: 145, MA: 89). The lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA), and the resultant arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) were measured. The aHKA 0 indicated valgus knee alignment. The primary outcome was the frequency of cases that resulted in an aHKA of ± 4° of neutral (0°), as assessed on full-leg standing radiographs obtained at 6 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcome was the change in coronal plane alignment of the knee classification (CPAK) type from preoperative to postoperative between the MA and KA groups. Results The mean preoperative aHKA was similar between the two groups (P = 0.19). The KA group had a mean postoperative aHKA of -1.4 ± 2.4°, while the MA group had a mean postoperative aHKA of -0.5 ± 2.1°. No significant difference in limb alignment was identified between KA and MA cases that resulted in HKA of ± 4° being neutral (91.7 versus 96.6%, P = 0.14). There were 97.2% of cases in the KA group that fell within the ± 5° range. The MA group was associated with a significantly higher rate of CPAK type change from pre- to post-operatively (P < 0.001). Conclusion Kinematic alignment achieved similar postoperative aHKA compared to MA, and thus did not significantly deviate from the principle of aligning the limb as close to neutral alignment as possible. Surgeons should feel comfortable starting to introduce individualized alignment techniques. Without being restricted by boundaries, postoperative alignment will be within 5 degrees of neutral 97% of the time.

orthopedics
Conventionally instrumented inverse kinematic alignment for total knee arthroplasty: How is it done?

Shane P. Russell,Sara Keyes,Michael T. Hirschmann,James A. Harty

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.12055

2024-06-13

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics

Abstract:Purpose For primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is an increasing trend towards patient‐specific alignment strategies such as kinematic alignment (KA) and inverse kinematic alignment (iKA), which by restoring native joint mechanics may yield higher patient satisfaction rates. Second, the most recent Australian joint registry report describes favourable revision rates for conventionally instrumented TKA compared to technology‐assisted techniques such as those using navigation, robotics or custom‐cutting blocks. The aim of this technique article is to describe in detail a surgical technique for TKA that: (1) utilises the principles of iKA and (2) uses conventionally instrumented guided resections thereby avoiding the use of navigation, robotics or custom blocks. Methods A TKA technique is described, whereby inverse kinematic principles are utilised and patient‐specific alignment is achieved. Additionally, the patellofemoral compartment of the knee is restored to the native patellofemoral joint line. The sequenced technical note provided may be utilised for cemented or cementless components; cruciate retaining or sacrificing designs and for fixed or rotating platforms. Results An uncomplicated, robust and reproducible technique for TKA is described. Discussion Knee arthroplasty surgeons may wish to harness the emerging benefits of both a conventionally instrumented technique and a patient‐specific alignment strategy. Level of Evidence Level V.
Inappropriate grouping of various kinematic alignment techniques and inconsistent reporting of adverse events invalidate comparison across studies: An umbrella review of meta‐analyses

Jeremy Cognault,Nicolas Verdier,ReSurg,European Knee Associates (EKA),Michael T. Hirschmann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12545

2024-12-05

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy

Abstract:Purpose This umbrella review aimed to identify, synthesise and critically appraise the findings of meta‐analyses that compare adverse events—rates of complications, reoperations and revisions—following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using unrestricted kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment. Methods Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses criteria, two authors independently screened articles based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and assessed the methodological quality based on the 16 domains of A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR‐2). Effect sizes of difference in rates of complications were tabulated for each meta‐analysis. Studies included in the meta‐analyses were assessed to determine if they were on true unrestricted kinematic alignment. A secondary meta‐analysis was performed, excluding studies on restricted kinematic alignment techniques, to calculate pooled estimates of adverse events (odds ratio [OR] with its 95% confidence interval [CI]) in a common effects framework with inverse‐variance weighting. Results Of 78 potential records, 13 meta‐analyses were eligible for data extraction, which pooled data from 15 clinical studies (10 on unrestricted kinematic alignment, four on restricted kinematic alignment and one on inverse kinematic alignment). None of the meta‐analyses fulfilled all seven critical AMSTAR‐2 domains. Meta‐analyses categorised adverse events differently and used different measures for the effect sizes but revealed no differences between kinematic versus mechanical alignment. Exclusion of studies on restricted kinematic alignment techniques reduced total sample sizes for kinematic alignment from 658 to 318 and for mechanical alignment from 811 to 403. Secondary meta‐analyses exclusively on unrestricted kinematic alignment revealed no difference in complications without reoperation, reoperation without implant removal or reoperation with implant removal following kinematic versus mechanical alignment. Conclusion Meta‐analyses do not distinguish between various kinematic alignment techniques, and adverse events are compared using different metrics. Surgeons, researchers and editors should refrain from pooling data on various kinematic alignment techniques, and orthopaedic societies should promote standards for reporting adverse events and effect sizes to facilitate comparisons across future studies. Level of Evidence Level III.

surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences

Recent advances in the management of myelofibrosis.

The Influence of Kinematic Alignment on Patellofemoral Joint Biomechanics in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Kinematic alignment recreates femoral trochlear geometry more closely than mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty

Does inverse kinematic alignment coupled with robot-assisted TKA optimize patellofemoral clinical and radiological results?

Skin torture.

Sparse and inconsistent reporting of pre‐ and post‐operative radiographic angles of total knee arthroplasty using true unrestricted kinematic alignment: An umbrella review and secondary meta‐analysis

The effect of different alignment strategies on trochlear orientation after total knee arthroplasty

Personalized alignment techniques better restore the native trochlear groove compared to systematic alignment techniques in total knee arthroplasty

Analysis of angular spread characteristics of mobile radio wave dispersion through foliage

Radiative kaon decays K+/---> pi +/- pi 0 gamma and direct CP violation.

Boundaries in Kinematic Alignment: Why, When, and How

Systematic review and meta-analysis of long term outcomes and innovations in Total Knee Arthroplasty: KINEMATIC, PERSONALIZED KNEE vs. CONVENTIONAL

Higher satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty using restricted inverse kinematic alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment

Superiority of kinematic alignment over mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty during medium‐ to long‐term follow‐up: A meta‐analysis and trial sequential analysis

Inverse kinematic total knee arthroplasty using conventional instrumentation restores constitutional coronal alignment

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: What is the optimal alignment correction to achieve success? The role of kinematic alignment

Hydrophobic characteristics of folded proteins.

Large multiplanar changes to native alignment have no apparent impact on clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty

No Difference in Limb Alignment Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Conventionally instrumented inverse kinematic alignment for total knee arthroplasty: How is it done?

Inappropriate grouping of various kinematic alignment techniques and inconsistent reporting of adverse events invalidate comparison across studies: An umbrella review of meta‐analyses