Abstract:Introduction: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a complex surgical procedure that traditionally relies on two-dimensional radiographs for pre-operative planning. These radiographs may not capture the intricate details of individual knee anatomy, potentially limiting the precision of surgical interventions. With advancements in imaging technology, there is an opportunity to refine TKA outcomes. This study introduces the Native Alignment Phenotype classification system that is based on pre-operative 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scans, aiming to provide a more detailed understanding of knee deformities and their influence on characterizing knee osteoarthritis and planning for TKA procedures. Methods: There were 1406 pre-operative non-weight-bearing CT scans analyzed by a single surgeon experienced with robotically-assisted total knee arthroplasties. These scans were converted into three-dimensional models, focusing on the coronal and sagittal planes. Intraoperatively, the robotic system was used to capture native coronal and sagittal deformities for each patient. These values were captured with the patient's leg held in a non-stress, extension pose. A new classification system, 'The Native Alignment Phenotype', was developed to categorize the specific differences between individual knees. Results: There were four primary knee malalignments identified: varus deformity; valgus deformity; and two deformities in the sagittal plane. These malalignments were further categorized based on the degrees of deviation, creating groups with 5° coronal and sagittal ranges. A total of 77 phenotypic alignment patterns were found based on the analyzed cohort. In the coronal plane, varus HKA deformity between 6 and 10° was the most common, with 36.9% of the cases, followed by varus HKA alignment, which was between 0 and 5°, representing 34.3% of the cases. In the sagittal plane, neutral and flexion contracture deformities between 0 and 5° were the most common, with 32.6% of the cases, followed by a fixed flexion contracture alignment, which was between 6 and 10°, representing 28.7% of the cases. When combining coronal and sagittal planes, the most common alignment was the varus between 0 and 5° with a flexion contracture between 0 and 5° (12.5% of cases), closely followed by the varus between 6 and 10° with a flexion contracture between 6 and 10° (12.4% of cases). Conclusion: The Native Alignment Phenotype classification system offers a nuanced understanding of knee deformities based on three-dimensional (CT scan) assessments, potentially leading to improved surgical outcomes in TKA. By leveraging the detailed data from the CT scans, this system provides a more comprehensive view of the knee's anatomy, emphasizing the importance of individualized, data-driven approaches in knee surgery.

Functional knee phenotypes: A helpful classification tool for visualizing potential femoral varus in restricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty in Japan

Three-dimensional-based native alignment phenotype classification system: Description for use in planning for deformities during total knee arthroplasty

Functional knee phenotypes: a novel classification for phenotyping the coronal lower limb alignment based on the native alignment in young non-osteoarthritic patients

Pre- and postoperative Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee classification and its impact on clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty

Preoperative phenotype has no significant impact on the clinical outcomes and long-term survival of mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty in Asian patients with osteoarthritis

Reoperations are few and confined to the most valgus phenotypes 4 years after unrestricted calipered kinematically aligned TKA

Higher satisfaction and function scores in restricted kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment with medial pivot design total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomised controlled trial

Evaluating axial alignment and knee phenotypes in a young Indian population, using X-rays converted to three-dimensional bone models, and their relevance in total knee arthroplasty

Restricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty with an anatomically designed implant can restore constitutional coronal lower limb alignment

Better restoration of joint line obliquity in tibia first restricted kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment TKA

The phenotypic diversity of anteromedial osteoarthritis before and after treatment with medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A radiographic analysis of 1000 knees

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty reproduces more native rollback and laxity than mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: A matched pair cadaveric study

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Ranawat II Valgus Deformity with Enlarged Femoral Valgus Cut Angle: A New Technique to Achieve Balanced Gap.

Comparison of the Radiologic, Morphometric, and Clinical Outcomes between Kinematically and Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Matching Study

Femoral and tibial phenotypes of varus alignment in a Southeast Asian arthritic population: a descriptive study

Functional knee phenotypes appear to be more suitable for the Chinese OA population compared with CPAK classification: A study based on 3D CT reconstruction models

Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Adjusted Restricted Kinematic Alignment for the Treatment of Severe Varus Deformity: Technical Note

No Difference in Limb Alignment Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

Deformity in valgus knee malalignment is not only in the femur but also in tibia or both, based on demographic and morphological analysis before and after knee osteotomies

Effects of Unrestricted Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Modified Soft-Tissue Respecting Technique on the Deformity of Limb Alignment in Japanese Patients

Higher satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty using restricted inverse kinematic alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment