Abstract:This paper analyzes a partnership between a civil society organization and a local government (CPP) for development planning in an emerging democracy. The paper shows that CPPs can promote better policy design and implementation of public policy by benefiting from the strengths of both nonprofits and government. The paper answers pending questions like, ‘in which contexts are CPPs effective?’, ‘what characteristics of nonprofits improve policy implementation?’; ‘how does the reputation and public trust that local nonprofits enjoy transfer to the partnership?’ and ‘to what extent does non-profit participation create more citizens engagement?’, among others. By answering these questions the paper shows the potential benefits that local government-nonprofits partnerships can bring to the policymaking process, but it also argues that effective CPPs are fraught with challenges. The paper demonstrates the need for more inclusive and identity-sensitive local governance mechanisms, and for institutional arrangements that anticipate conflict and address increasing inequalities and community disengagement. The paper shows that effective governance is a collaborative venture in which social inputs need to be taken into account in program design; and a shared vision of the common good needs to be built-up for policy implementation.By exposing the tensions and conflicts of this governance experiment, the paper draws lessons for nonprofits, governments, and policymakers who seek to participate or design collaborative ventures.The case studied is the program of Pueblos Magicos in Valle de Bravo, Mexico, an instructive object of study, which lessons are not unique to this small town in central Mexico, but common to towns experiencing rapid demographic and economic growth elsewhere.

Governing Without Government: Nonprofit Governance in Detroit and Flint

Exploring the Role of Nonprofits in Public Service Provision: Moving from Co-production to Co-governance

A Neoliberal Response to an Urban Crisis: Emergency Management in Flint, MI

When Government Becomes the Principal Philanthropist: the Effects of Public Funding on Patterns of Nonprofit Governance

Local Effects of State Takeovers: Drinking water systems in Michigan

Between Public and Private Action

Power, Participation, and Protest in Flint, Michigan: Unpacking the Policy Paradox of Municipal Takeovers

Exploring Collaborative Governance Processes Involving Nonprofits

Governing for the Common Good: The Possibilities of Sociocracy in Nonprofit Organizations

Organizing Under Austerity: How Residents’ Concerns Became the Flint Water Crisis

Designing Web Technologies for Local Governance Reform: Good Management or Good Democracy?

Paternalistic or Participatory Governance? Examining Opportunities for Client Participation in Nonprofit Social Service Organizations

Nonprofit governance and outside corruption: The role of accountability, stakeholder participation, and management systems

LIVING WITH LEAD: OLDER ADULTS’ EXPERIENCES OF NECROPOLITICAL WATER GOVERNANCE IN FLINT, MICHIGAN

Nonprofit-Public Partnerships for Local Development: Social Inputs in Policy Implementation

New Public Governance, Social Services, and the Potential of Co-Located Nonprofit Centers for Improved Collaborations

Fostering Local Government Collaboration: An Empirical Analysis of Case Studies in Ohio

A Case Study of Public-Nonprofit Collaboration in Social Service Delivery

Patterns of Governance: The Curious Case of Non‐profit Community Services in Australia

Models of Collaborative Governance: The City of Los Angeles’ Foreclosure Registry Program