Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the pay and performance of chief executive officers (CEOs) in Portuguese, non‐profit organizations (NPOs), focusing on the role played by the economic performance of the organization, together with that played by the structure of the board and the individual characteristics of the manager. If the CEO can influence the board structure, agency problems arise, which in turn allow the CEO to extract rent and demand compensation in excess of the equilibrium level. Design/methodology/approach An ordinary least squares (OLS) model and an instrumental variable (IV) models are estimated for comparative purposes. The IV permits to account for endogenous variables in the regression. Findings It is concluded that governance is important in the Portuguese non‐profit sector. Several variables affect the CEO, namely, organization performance variables, board composition variables and individual variables. This result highlights the urgent need for a code of governance practice to be introduced in this sector. Moreover, the paper integrates human capital in the definition of the earnings, concluding that this also contributes to earnings. Research limitations/implications This paper has two limitations. The first is related to the data set and the second with the method adopted. With the reference to the data set, the span is limited and therefore the generalization of this result is questionable. A larger data span is needed to confirm the present results. Relative to the method, the OLS is unable to handle endogeneity variables in a regression. The instrumental variables (IV) can overcome this result, but some critics to this method have appear recently, when there are heterogeneous across subjects and local IV are needed. Practical implication A governance code should be adopted, involving NPO managers in their definition. A regulatory agency that will be the watch dog of the process should be implemented to enforce the modernization of Portuguese NPO. Originality/value This is the first paper analyzing governance issues on Portuguese NPO and the second paper at European level on NPO governance. It clarifies two issues, the absence of governance principles in Portuguese NPO and the need of a regulatory agency in this context.

Nonprofit governance and outside corruption: The role of accountability, stakeholder participation, and management systems

Corporate Philanthropy and Corporate Misconduct: Evidence from China

Examining the Efficacy of Accountability Systems in Preventing Nonprofit Misconduct: A Look Beyond Financial Fraud

Does expenditure in public governance guarantee less corruption? Non-linearities and complementarities of the rule of law

Does Better Governance Guarantee Less Corruption? Evidence of Loss in Effectiveness of the Rule of Law

Governing Without Government: Nonprofit Governance in Detroit and Flint

Exploring Collaborative Governance Processes Involving Nonprofits

The role of public-sector accounting in controlling corruption: an assessment of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries

Accountability Online: Understanding the Web-Based Accountability Practices of Nonprofit Organizations

Fighting corruption: A theoretical articulation of the themes of social responsibility, corporate governance, and agency theory

Does stakeholder engagement affect corruption risk management?

Nonprofit Accountability:A Public Choice Perspective

Financial Reporting Quality and Online Disclosure Practices in Spanish Governmental Agencies

The power‐structure model of non‐profit governance

The Impact of Organizational Culture on the Effectiveness of Corporate Governance to Control Earnings Management

Local political corruption and Firm's non-GAAP reporting

Governance and CEO pay and performance in non‐profit organizations

Governing for the Common Good: The Possibilities of Sociocracy in Nonprofit Organizations

Nonprofit organizationsbusiness co-creation as a consequence of relational norms: Can improve it with a business-like approach?

The multiplicity of logics, trust, and interdependence in donor‐imposed reporting practices in the nonprofit sector