Abstract:Over the past few decades, a new form of governance has emerged to replace adversarial and managerial modes of policy making and implementation. Collaborative governance, as it has come to be known, brings public and private stakeholders together in collective forums with public agencies to engage in consensus-oriented decision making. In this article, we conduct a meta-analytical study of the existing literature on collaborative governance with the goal of elaborating a contingency model of collaborative governance. After reviewing 137 cases of collaborative governance across a range of policy sectors, we identify critical variables that will influence whether or not this mode of governance will produce successful collaboration. These variables include the prior history of conflict or cooperation, the incentives for stakeholders to participate, power and resources imbalances, leadership, and institutional design. We also identify a series of factors that are crucial within the collaborative process itself. These factors include face-to-face dialogue, trust building, and the development of commitment and shared understanding. We found that a virtuous cycle of collaboration tends to develop when collaborative forums focus on ‘‘small wins’’ that deepen trust, commitment, and shared understanding. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of our contingency model for practitioners and for future research on collaborative governance. Over the last two decades, a new strategy of governing called ‘‘collaborative governance’’ has developed. This mode of governance brings multiple stakeholders together in common forums with public agencies to engage in consensus-oriented decision making. In this article, we conduct a meta-analytical study of the existing literature on collaborative governance with the goal of elaborating a general model of collaborative governance. The ultimate goal is to develop a contingency approach to collaboration that can highlight conditions under which collaborative governance will be more or less effective as an

New Public Governance, Social Services, and the Potential of Co-Located Nonprofit Centers for Improved Collaborations

Exploring the Role of Nonprofits in Public Service Provision: Moving from Co-production to Co-governance

Exploring Collaborative Governance Processes Involving Nonprofits

Mechanisms of Obtaining Corporates Competitive Advantage by Collaborating with Nonprofit Organizations

Public–Nonprofit Collaboration in Homeless Services: Are Nonprofit-Led Networks More Effective in Winning Federal Funding?

Understanding Collaboration among Nonprofit Organizations: Combining Resource Dependency, Institutional, and Network Perspectives

Evaluating the Role of Government Collaboration in the Perceived Performance of Community-Based Nonprofits: Three Propositions

Connecting the Composition of Collaborative Governance Structure to Community‐Level Performance in Homeless Services

A Case Study of Public-Nonprofit Collaboration in Social Service Delivery

Governance and Competition: The Role of Non-profit Organisations in the Delivery of Public Services

Linking Collaborative Capacity to Performance Measurement in Government—Nonprofit Partnerships

Nonprofit-Public Partnerships for Local Development: Social Inputs in Policy Implementation

Collaborative governance and information technology innovation: public–nonprofit partnerships to build neighborhood information systems

Governing for the Common Good: The Possibilities of Sociocracy in Nonprofit Organizations

From Service Contracting to Collaborative Governance: Evolution of Government–Nonprofit Relations

Paternalistic or Participatory Governance? Examining Opportunities for Client Participation in Nonprofit Social Service Organizations

How Structural Variations in Collaborative Governance Networks Influence Advocacy Involvement and Outcomes

Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice

Governing Without Government: Nonprofit Governance in Detroit and Flint

Privatizing the Welfare State: Nonprofit Community-Based Organizations as Political Actors