Abstract:The purpose of this paper is the physical deduction of the loading curves for spherical and flat punch indentations, in particular as the parabola assumption for not self-similar spherical impressions appears impossible. These deductions avoid the still common first energy law violations of ISO 14577 by consideration of the work done by elastic and plastic pressure work. The hitherto generally accepted “parabolas” exponents on the depth h (“2 for cone, 3/2 for spheres, and 1 for flat punches”) are still the unchanged basis of ISO 14577 standards that also enforce the up to 3 + 8 free iteration parameters for ISO hardness and ISO elastic indentation modulus. Almost all of these common practices are now challenged by physical mathematical proof of exponent 3/2 for cones by removing the misconceptions with indentation against a projected surface (contact) area with violation of the first energy law, because the elastic and inelastic pressure work cannot be obtained from nothing. Physically correct is the impression of a volume that is coupled with pressure formation that creates elastic deformation and numerous types of plastic deformations. It follows the exponent 3/2 only for the cones/pyramids/wedges loading parabola. It appears impossible that the geometrically not self-similar sphere loading curve is an h3/2 parabola. Hertz did only deduce the touching of the sphere and Sneddon did not get a parabola for the sphere . The radius over depth ratio is not constant with the sphere. The apparently good correlation of such parabola plots at large R/h ratios and low h-values do es not withstand against the deduced physical equation for the spherical indentation loading curve. Such plots are unphysical for the sphere and so tried regression results indicate data-treatments. The closed physical deduction result consists of the exponential factor h3/2 and a dimensionless correction factor that is depth dependent. The non-parabola against force plot using published data is concavely bent even for large radius/depth-ratios at the shallow indents. The capabilities of conical/pyramidal/wedged indentations are thus lost. These facts are outlined for experimental nano- and micro-indentations. Spherical indentations reveal that linear data regression is suspicious and worthless if it does not correspond with physical reality. This stresses the necessity of the straightforward deductions of the correct relations on the basis of iteration-less and fitting-less undeniable calculation rules on a n undeniable basic physical understanding. The straightforward physical deduction of the flat punch indentation is therefore also presented, together with formulas for the physical indentation hardness, indentation work, and applied work for these geometrically self-similar indentations. It is exemplified with a macroindentation.

Indentation processes in poly(methylmethacrylate). II. Cone indentation and deep punching

New expanding cavity model for conical indentation and its application to determine an intrinsic length scale of polymeric materials

On the relationship between plastic zone radius and maximum depth during nanoindentation

Indentation of A Square Elastomeric Thin Film by A Flat-Ended Cylindrical Punch in the Presence of Long-Range Intersurface Forces

The Effect of Indenter Angle on the Microindentation Hardness

The Influence of Indenter Tip Imperfection and Deformability on Analysing Instrumented Indentation Tests at Shallow Depths of Penetration on Stiff and Hard Materials

Indenter Geometrical Effects on Sub-Micro/Nano Indentation and Scratch Behaviors of Polymeric Surfaces

Indentation Responses of Piezoelectric Films

Orientation-dependent indentation response of helium-implanted tungsten

Indentation of Irreversibly Compressible Material: Computer Simulation

Elastic Contact Versus Indentation Modeling of Multilayered Materials

A Numerical Study of Indentation with Small Spherical Indenters

An MD Simulation Study to the Indentation Size Effect of Polystyrene and Polyethylene with Various Indenter Shapes and Loading Rates

The Loading Curve of Spherical Indentions Is Not a Parabola and Flat Punch Is Linear

Spherical Indentation into Elastoplastic Materials: Indentation-response Based Definitions of the Representative Strain

A coupled approach to predict cone-cracks in spherical indentation tests with smooth or rough indenters

Friction Effect on Micro-indentation Measurement with Different Indenters

The Influence of Indenter Tip Radius on the Micro-Indentation Hardness

Deformation field in deep flat punch indentation and the persistence of dead-metal zones

Towards understanding the influence of structured indenters geometry on material deformation behavior of indentation process

A New Scheme for Computational Modeling of Conical Indentation in Plastically Graded Materials