Abstract:We consider a socially responsible firm that is concerned with its profit as well as consumer surplus, following the preference of pro-social executives, consumer activists, activist shareholders, or a government shareholder. Specifically, we study the decisions faced by a newsvendor whose objective is modeled as a weighted average of the expected profit and consumer surplus, with the weight on consumer surplus referred to as the corporate social responsibility (CSR) level. Our model includes the pure profit-maximizing and non-profit firms as two extreme cases. We study the firm's optimal inventory decision in the base model and the optimal joint price and inventory decisions in an extension. Our results show that the socially conscious executives (resp., the government as a shareholder) would face less resistance from the firm's general shareholders (resp., the firm) when imposing a lower CSR level, yet with which it enjoys a more significant improvement in boosting consumer surplus at the cost of a marginal profit loss by the firm, in both relative and absolute terms. We also provide demand-distribution-free guarantees on the performance of enduring profit loss in exchange for consumer surplus achieved by a CSR level. Moreover, we show that the same level of demand variability has a less negative impact on the firm's objective when its CSR level is higher; under normal demand, with a little CSR, such a negative impact has a larger reduction for a product with a higher coefficient of variation or a lower critical ratio. Finally, one of our numerical studies using practical data demonstrates that for an influenza vaccine of Afluria Quadrivalent, a CSR level of 10\% enables the firm to improve consumer surplus by 17.8\% (of the maximum improvement) at the expense of a profit loss of only 1.2\% (of the maximum loss) for a typical demand's coefficient of variation level of $0.4$. Our results imply and quantify the managerial insight that a little CSR can go a long way, which holds robustly in a variety of forms and senses for the newsvendor setting.

When more competition may damage welfare with socially responsible firms

Corporate Social Responsibility and International Competition: A Welfare Analysis

Does the Coexistence of Online and Offline Firms Improve Welfare

Consumption network externalities, corporate social responsibility, and conflicting interests: Cournot vs. Bertrand competition

To Introduce Competition or Not to Introduce Competition: an Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility Investment Collaboration in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain

How does corporate altruism affect oligopolistic competition?

On excessive entry in Bayes‐Cournot oligopoly

Welfare‐Increasing Monopolization

Passive cross‐holdings, horizontal differentiation, and welfare

A Note on R&D Innovation with Socially Responsible Firms

Non-cooperative corporate social responsibility, bargaining, and double marginalization in bilateral monopoly

Strategic And Welfare Implications Of Product Bundling Under Bertrand Competition

Corporate social responsibility by joint agreement

Cross Ownership Under Strategic Tax Policy

Cross-licensing, R&D spillovers, and welfare

Welfare effects of variable and fixed cost subsidies in profit, non‐profit and mixed markets

Socially Responsible Newsvendor

Corporate social responsibility and bargaining in unionized markets

Supply Chain Design and Carbon Penalty: Monopoly vs. Monopolistic Competition

Could Breaking up the Monopolies Improve the Welfare?——Analysis Based on a Schumpeterian Growth Model

Market Entry and Network Externalities