Abstract:Governments in many countries have implemented regulatory policies (such as tax reduction and subsidy provision) to support the development and operation of capital-constrained small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that may compete each other in practice. To better understand the impacts of these government regulatory policies on capital-constrained SMEs, bank, consumers and social welfare, this paper develops a Cournot competition model consisting of two competing and capital-constrained retailers in a market with demand uncertain. We completely obtain the optimal procurement decisions of two retailers and the optimal loan interest decision of the bank, and compare the effects of two government supporting policies (i.e., tax reduction and subsidy provision) in a Nash game of the two retailers. Our result shows that the difference of the two retailers' procurement costs closely affects the procurement decision of the retailer who possess cost advantage, and this retailer orders more under government regulatory policy than that without government regulation if the procurement costs of two retailers are relatively balanced. In addition, the tax reduction can improve the profits of the retailers engaged in the competitive market when the gap of their procurement costs is small relatively, whereas the subsidy provision can always improve the profit of the retailer who does not possesses procurement cost advantage. We also find that the bank lowers its interest rate to both retailers under the tax reduction; under the subsidy provision, the opposite result is true. Our finding can demonstrate that there exists a win-win-win situation for the two retailers, consumers and society in the bank financing with government tax reduction/subsidy provision. The numerical studies show that the improvement of social welfare is more significant in the subsidy provision than that in the tax reduction.

Cross Ownership Under Strategic Tax Policy

Passive cross‐holdings, horizontal differentiation, and welfare

Corporate Social Responsibility and International Competition: A Welfare Analysis

Commercial policies, unilateral versus bilateral foreign ownership, and welfare

Foreign competition and optimal privatization with excess burden of taxation

Tax competition in federations revisited

Cross-ownership and strategic environmental corporate social responsibility under price competition

Cross-licensing, R&D spillovers, and welfare

Cross‐ownership, business dynamism, and wage inequality in general equilibrium

Imported Inputs and Privatization in Downstream Mixed Oligopoly with Foreign Ownership

Strategic And Welfare Implications Of Product Bundling Under Bertrand Competition

Cooperation between governments to set up public firms

On-demand ride-hailing platforms in competition with the taxi industry: Pricing strategies and government supervision

Welfare Implications of Switching to Consumption Taxation

Welfare effects of variable and fixed cost subsidies in profit, non‐profit and mixed markets

Partial Ownership for a Public Firm and Corporate Social Responsibility

Consumption network externalities, corporate social responsibility, and conflicting interests: Cournot vs. Bertrand competition

Port privatization under Cournot vs. Bertrand competition: a third-market approach

Cross‐Ownership, Green Managerial Delegation, and Emission Taxation

Competitive cross‐subsidization

Political Economy Model of Cross‐Border Mergers under Mixed Oligopoly