Abstract:Three strictly comparable cross-section household dataset,related to 1988,1995 and 2001,are used to analyze the rapid yet unequal growth of wage and the sharp widening of wage structure.Earnings functions are compared and the increase in both the level and the inequality of wages are decomposed into their constituent elements.Distinctions are made between the variables likely to represent human capital,discrimination,and segmentation.The evidence suggests that productive characteristics were increasingly rewarded as marketization The Gini coefficient of earnings rose by 10.7 percentage points in the first phase from 1988 to 1995.Whereas the mean wage increased by 67 percent,the pay of the 10th percentile rose by only 22 percent,and that of the 90th percentile rose by 97 percent.These changes are much larger than those of the second phase from 1995 to 2001.Moreover,the returns to education rose sharply,as did the returns to occupation-specific skills.The initially slight inverse-U shape of the age-earnings profile became more pronounced: a change consistent with human capital theory.Thus the productive characteristics of workers were increasingly rewarded in the labor market.However,there were also signs of greater wage discrimination against women.Moreover,the market forces operating in the growing private sector and the relative immunity of the state sector from those forces generated greater wage segmentation among types of ownership,and provincial differences in the pace of reform and in economic growth created spatial segmentation in wages that could not be removed by the equilibrating movement of labor.Decomposition analyses were conducted in order to examine the contribution of particular characteristics to the rise in the Gini coefficient.Only a third of earnings inequality and its increase could be explained: the unobserved determinants are clearly important to the increase in earnings dispersion.The discrimination variables accounted for only a small part of the increase.The segmentation variables made the most important contribution,and that was mainly due to growing wage dispersion among provinces.This result is supported by other evidence of powerful divergence in mean earnings among provinces(Knight,Li and Zhao,2001).Some but not all components of human capital were disequalizing.These particular changes are likely to represent the stirring of labor market forces.

Cross‐ownership, business dynamism, and wage inequality in general equilibrium

The Wage Gap Between State And Private Enterprises In China: Counterfactual Analysis Based On Quantile Regression

Firm-Size Effect on Wages:Evidence from Chinese Competitive Labor Market

Rising Wage Inequality:Composition Effect and Price Effect

International Factor Mobility, Monopolistic Competition, and Wage Inequality

Marketization and Unequal Growth of Wage: Their Extent and Influence Factors

Competition policy in a general‐equilibrium platform economy

Passive cross‐holdings, horizontal differentiation, and welfare

Corporate structure, partial privatization, and wage inequality: Evidence from China's split share structure reform

Common Ownership, Executive Compensation, and Product Market Competition

Restrictions of Ownership and Factors Price Distortion:An Empirical Study Using the Industrial Data of China

Cross Ownership Under Strategic Tax Policy

Cross-ownership as a structural explanation for rising correlations in crisis times

Horizontal Mergers and Wage Inequality

Quantifying Market Power and Business Dynamism

Does common ownership constrain managerial rent extraction? Evidence from insider trading profitability

Institutional Cross-Ownership and Corporate Strategy: The Case of Mergers and Acquisitions

A Firm Link: Overall, Between- and Within-Firm Inequality Through the Lens of a Sorting Model

Insecure Resources, Rent Seeking, and Wage Inequality

Wages as signals of worker mobility

Winner-takes-all or inclusive growth? The impact of digitalization on inter-firm wage inequality: evidence from China