Abstract:In the 21st century, the trend of globalization expands widely and rapidly. As one of the most important drives, foreign direct investment (FDI) has been paid more and more attention for its effects on constructing the technological innovation capability and sustainable strategic competitiveness in the less developed countries. Now there are two different points of view on the effect from the entering FDI to the technological development in China: positive spillovers or negative spillovers. In fact the final result in the most of the empirical researches is an output mixed the two-sided effects. We can not only judge FDI by the final result, but also anatomize it. The research uses production function model based on panel data from 37 industrial enterprises in China from year 1998 to 2003. Most data comes from the yearbook of Chinese Industry and the yearbook of science and technology of China. It supposes that the technological spillovers follows the path from the FDI to the industrial innovative input which includes ″input structure″, ″input intensity″, then to the industrial innovative output which includes ″innovative effect″, ″innovative efficiency″, ″export competitive ability″, ″marginalization risk″. In the first part, the direct model discusses the relationship between innovative output and FDI. There are positive relationships between the entering of FDI and innovation effect, innovation efficiency and export in short time. But from the view of technological marginalization, FDI has strong influences on local companies' market reduction, technological dependence in the long run, and R&D capabilities' shrinking. In the second part, the indirect model discusses the relationship of the two innovative output variables mediated by innovative input intensity and innovative input structure. FDI impacts indirectly on innovative efficiency through influencing on innovative input intensity of the industry. And the structure of innovative fund source influences the usage efficiency of the fund and the innovative efficiency. It also partly moderates the relationship between FDI and innovative efficiency. In further study, it finds out that market growth, market competition and technological appropriation have partial mediating effects on the relationship between FDI and innovative input intensity of the industry.In summary, more and more technologies of the industries in China will come from outward sources in the future. The globalization of manufacturing has opened the opportunity window of learning for Chinese companies. And it brings big challenges at the same time.

Cross-licensing, R&D spillovers, and welfare

The Spillover Effects of Innovation Content Disclosure in MD&A

A Study on the Effect of Spillovers of Foreign Direct Investment to Chinese Industrial Technological Innovation

Cross‐licensing or not: The optimal choices of competing ICT firms in a duopoly market

Technology spillover and innovation

Absorptive capacity, product heterogeneity and technology licensing under different fee scenarios

Strategic Delegation And Licensing Of Patented Technology Under To Fixed Fee Schedule

Generic technology R&D decision with technology spillover, cost difference, and bargaining power under oligopoly competition

Mergers and Licensing With Horizontal Differentiation

Endogenous Timing of R&D Decisions and Privatization Policy with Research Spillovers

Privatization and innovation in a vertical structure

Horizontal licensing in vertically related markets

Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry

Passive cross‐holdings, horizontal differentiation, and welfare

When your friend takes a fall: Spillovers of patent infringement lawsuits on firm innovation via cross-owners

Technology Licensing under Successive Monopoly

R&D Efficiencies,Technical Spillovers and R&D Subsidies

Cross-Regional University-Firm Patent License And Regional Innovation Capacity: Moderating Role Of Regional Marketization Degree

Technology licensing strategies for three cost-differential manufacturers

Network Effects and Technology Licensing

Technology spillover, corporate investment, and stock returns