Cooperation Of Green R&D In Supply Chain With Downstream Competition
Yifan Wu,Xuejie Zhang,Jing Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107571
IF: 7.18
2021-01-01
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Abstract:The green research and development (R&D) cooperation between supplier and manufacturer is becoming more common. This study focuses on the R&D cooperation between one common supplier and two competing manufacturers and investigates the impact of spillover rates, R&D efficiencies, competition level on the equilibrium solutions. The supplier is the Stackelberg leader, who choose to offer a cooperation proposal to one or both of the manufacturers. The manufacturers decide if they are willing to accept the cooperation independently. There are possibly four scenarios, namely, non-cooperation between the supplier and the manufacturers (C-0), the supplier cooperates with manufacturer i alone (C-i, i = 1, 2) and the supplier cooperates with both manufacturers (C1+2). Then the supplier and the manufacturers decide their investment levels simultaneously. The supplier decides the same wholesale price for both manufacturers and the manufacturers decide their selling prices. We find that the supplier's investment level increases with the technology spillover rates but the manufacturers' investment levels with respect to the technology spillover rates depend on its R&D efficiencies and the competition level. The supplier's investment level is not influenced by the manufacturers' R&D efficiencies, but its wholesale price is affected by each player's R&D efficiency. Moreover, the R&D efficiencies of manufacturers have a crucial influence on each player's cooperation preference. The supplier prefers C1+2 when both manufacturers' R&D efficiencies are high or low, otherwise, it prefers Ci. However, the manufacturers prefer Ci to C1+2. Finally, we reveal the overall equilibrium cooperation outcomes. Specially, the manufacturers will be forced to accept the supplier's proposal of C1+2 when their R&D efficiencies are relatively low. The practical implications are also discussed to provide guidelines for firms to make cooperation decisions.