Abstract:Purpose Motivated by the real-world practice of the thriving e-commerce, manufacturers are transcending traditional boundaries of merely producing and selling directly by implementing encroachment. Concurrently, supply chain (SC) members who overlook the corporate social responsibility (CSR) sharing will be left behind, which is closely linked to their profits. This paper aims to investigate a better way to share CSR under the scenarios of manufacturer encroachment and no-encroachment. Design/methodology/approach This paper constructs game-theoretic models in a SC consisting of a manufacturer (M) and a retailer (R), where the manufacturer can sell products by retailing, and may sell directly by implicating encroachment. The manufacturer and retailer jointly consider whether to share CSR and the proportion of it by taking consumer surplus into account. Furthermore, equilibriums for each model are derived using backward induction. Then, the authors analyse the impact of CSR sharing proportion and compare the equilibrium outcomes under different scenarios. Finally, the numerical analyses are presented to verify the results. Findings Several interesting results are found in this paper. First, the retailer shares more CSR can benefit SC members and social welfare when the manufacturer does not implement encroachment. However, the results may change which is decided by the unit cost of encroachment when the manufacturer does so. Second, the proportion of CSR shared by manufacturer and the unit cost of encroachment has an interactive impact on equilibrium outcomes. Finally, both manufacturer encroachment and SC members share CSR may be the best for the perspective of SC members and consumers. Practical implications Based on the analytical results, this paper provides novel managerial implications to assist manufacturer and retailer in determining the optimal strategies for CSR sharing and encroachment. Furthermore, the appropriate proportion of CSR shared by manufacturer and the unit cost of encroachment may let manufacturer, retailer and consumer surplus achieve a win-win-win situation. Originality/value To the best of the authors' knowledge, this paper is the first attempt to explore the strategy of CSR sharing under the scenarios of manufacturer encroachment and no-encroachment.

Socially Responsible Newsvendor

Corporate Social Responsibility Development: An Analysis Based on Consumer-selection

Impacts of Distributional Social Comparison Behavior on Corporate Social Responsibility: Power of the Small

Socially Responsible Supply Chains and Subsidy Policies

Corporate Social Responsibility and International Competition: A Welfare Analysis

NON-COOPERATIVE TWO-ECHELON SUPPLY CHAINS WITH A FOCUS ON SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

Impacts of Distributive Comparison Behavior on Corporate Social Responsibility in Supply Chains: The Role of Small Firms

A coordination mechanism through value‐added profit distribution in a supply chain considering corporate social responsibility

The Manufacturer Decision Analysis for Corporate Social Responsibility under Government Subsidy

The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Trade Credit: Evidence from Chinese Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Enterprises

The Impact of CSR Implement Modes on Sustainable Supply Chain Pricing and Green Decision Making

Firm Decisions and Government Subsidies in a Supply Chain with Consumer Surplus Consideration

Bad Greenwashing, Good Greenwashing: Corporate Social Responsibility and Information Transparency

Sustainable Strategies: Navigating Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility for Enlightened Self-Interest

Equilibrium strategies of sharing CSR in a supply chain with manufacturer encroachment

Dual-Channel Green Supply Chain Decision-Making and Coordination considering CSR and Consumer Green Preferences

Optimal strategies for product price, customer environmental volunteering, and corporate environmental responsibility

Non-cooperative corporate social responsibility, bargaining, and double marginalization in bilateral monopoly

Who will undertake corporate social responsibility in supply chain encroachment? Manufacturer or retailer

Supply Chain Models with Mutual Commitments and Implications for Social Responsibility

A Newsvendor Problem Considering Decision Biases of Strategic Customers with Private Product Value Information