Abstract:Purpose Motivated by the real-world practice of the thriving e-commerce, manufacturers are transcending traditional boundaries of merely producing and selling directly by implementing encroachment. Concurrently, supply chain (SC) members who overlook the corporate social responsibility (CSR) sharing will be left behind, which is closely linked to their profits. This paper aims to investigate a better way to share CSR under the scenarios of manufacturer encroachment and no-encroachment. Design/methodology/approach This paper constructs game-theoretic models in a SC consisting of a manufacturer (M) and a retailer (R), where the manufacturer can sell products by retailing, and may sell directly by implicating encroachment. The manufacturer and retailer jointly consider whether to share CSR and the proportion of it by taking consumer surplus into account. Furthermore, equilibriums for each model are derived using backward induction. Then, the authors analyse the impact of CSR sharing proportion and compare the equilibrium outcomes under different scenarios. Finally, the numerical analyses are presented to verify the results. Findings Several interesting results are found in this paper. First, the retailer shares more CSR can benefit SC members and social welfare when the manufacturer does not implement encroachment. However, the results may change which is decided by the unit cost of encroachment when the manufacturer does so. Second, the proportion of CSR shared by manufacturer and the unit cost of encroachment has an interactive impact on equilibrium outcomes. Finally, both manufacturer encroachment and SC members share CSR may be the best for the perspective of SC members and consumers. Practical implications Based on the analytical results, this paper provides novel managerial implications to assist manufacturer and retailer in determining the optimal strategies for CSR sharing and encroachment. Furthermore, the appropriate proportion of CSR shared by manufacturer and the unit cost of encroachment may let manufacturer, retailer and consumer surplus achieve a win-win-win situation. Originality/value To the best of the authors' knowledge, this paper is the first attempt to explore the strategy of CSR sharing under the scenarios of manufacturer encroachment and no-encroachment.

To Introduce Competition or Not to Introduce Competition: an Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility Investment Collaboration in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain

Corporate Social Responsibility and International Competition: A Welfare Analysis

Research on the strategy of competition and collaboration in commerce chain

Impacts of Distributive Comparison Behavior on Corporate Social Responsibility in Supply Chains: The Role of Small Firms

To collaborate or not? Analysis of competitive manufacturers' green innovation strategy toward sustainability

Impacts of Distributional Social Comparison Behavior on Corporate Social Responsibility: Power of the Small

CSR investment decision and coordination strategy for closed-loop supply chain with two competing retailers

Compete or Cooperate: Intensity, Dynamics, and Optimal Strategies

Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Operations of a Live-Streaming Supply Chain

Equilibrium strategies of sharing CSR in a supply chain with manufacturer encroachment

Collusion or Not: the Optimal Choice of Competing Retailers in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain

Foreign competition and corporate social responsibility: the role of the firm–government relationships

Consumption network externalities, corporate social responsibility, and conflicting interests: Cournot vs. Bertrand competition

Competition or Coopetition? Equilibrium Analysis in the Presence of Process Improvement

Research on Pricing Strategies for Competitive Green Supply Chain Based on Corporate Social Responsibility

Competition and Supply Chain Integration: a Taxonomy Perspective

Manufacturer's cooperation strategy of closed-loop supply chain considering corporate social responsibility

A coordination mechanism through value‐added profit distribution in a supply chain considering corporate social responsibility

How Retailer Co-Opetition Impacts Pricing, Collecting and Coordination in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain

Competition in a dual-channel supply chain considering duopolistic retailers with different behaviours

Dual-Channel Green Supply Chain Decision-Making and Coordination considering CSR and Consumer Green Preferences