Abstract:The Chinese party-state shares with other large, hierarchical organizations significant agency problems; local agents of the state tend to be have opportunistically, contrary to the interests of their principals. Such agency problems stem from conflicts of interest between principals and agents and from information asymmetries that typically characterize principal–agent relations. State officials in China employ a formal evaluation system (kaohe zhidu) to control the behavior of their subordinates. Drawing on principal–agent theory, this paper contends that the nature of the evaluation system helps to explain dysfunctional aspects of policy implementation at the grass roots and that problems with policy implementation, in turn, help to explain subsequent changes in the evaluation system itself. This characterization is consistent with adaptive learning on the part of principals. In the final section, the chapter argues that, paradoxically, even as the evaluation system has exacerbated problems in policy implementation, it has simultaneously contributed to the durability of rule by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Indeed, the relative stability of CCP rule, in contrast to the loss of power by communist parties in other former socialist states and contrary to claims of pervasive political decay in China, demands explanation. The chapter begins by providing some background on the development of the cadre evaluation system since the initiation of reform in 1978, arguing that changes in cadre evaluation represent an early and important element of political reform in China – albeit not democratic political reform. The next section analyzes the characteristics of the system in terms of principal–agent theory.

Seeking performance or control? Tethered party innovation in China’s performance evaluation system

From Manipulation to Integration: the Strategic Transformation of Grassroots Control in China

Monetary Incentives and Innovation in Chinese SMEs

Reassessing the Performance Evaluation System in the Xi Jinping Era: Changes and Implications

Assessment of Innovative Performance Management in Chinese Police System

The Elusive Pursuit of Incentive Systems: Research on the Cadre Management Regime in Post-Mao China

Party Management of Talent: Building a Party‐led, Merit‐based Talent Market in China

Does Performance Matter? Evaluating Political Selection Along the Chinese Administrative Ladder

Can Innovation Incentive Policies Improve the Innovation Performance of Knowledge Workers? Evidence from Chinese State-Owned Enterprises

Political Incentives and Local Policy Innovations in China

The Cadre Evaluation System at the Grass Roots: The Paradox of Party Rule

Mandate Versus Championship: Vertical government intervention and diffusion of innovation in public services in authoritarian China

Policy Experiments:Start -up Mechanisms and Internal Logic---Case Studies on the Performance Management Policies in China’s Public Sectors

Scholars, strategists or stakeholders? Competing rationalities and impact of performance evaluation for academic managers in Chinese universities

Party Building as Institutional Bricolage: Asserting Authority at the Business Frontier

Political Turnover and Economic Performance: the Incentive Role of Personnel Control in China

Go East, Young Cadre: Experiments in Inter‐Provincial Training of Party and State Managers in China

Policy Innovation of Local Officials in China: the Administrative Choice

Tournament Style Bargaining within Boundaries: Setting Targets in China’s Cadre Evaluation System

The politics of performance measurement in China

Economic performance of state‐owned enterprises under the Chinese Communist Party's supervision: Some reflection on China's economic reform