Abstract:: For a long time, China’s grassroots mass self-governance organizations, represented by urban community residents’ committees and rural villagers’ committees, as the important main body of social governance activities, have to a certain extent deviated from their functional “self-governance” function due to the “administrative” tendency in their institutional inertia. As modern social governance attaches greater importance to multi-factor participation and multi-dimensional cooperation in governance activities, the concept of governance that synergizes “self-governance and shared governance” has been given high priority in the governance of China's urban and rural communities, and has become a key element in the “common building, common governance and shared sharing” social governance system and governance system of the times, which is highly characteristic of socialism with Chinese characteristics. The concept of “self-governance and shared governance” has been highly valued in the governance of urban and rural communities in China, and has been embodied in the modernization of the social governance system and governance capacity, which is very characteristic of the socialist era with Chinese characteristics. In this process, the Party’s leadership has been consistently applied throughout the entire process and in all aspects of grassroots governance; the political function of community Party organizations has been continuously strengthened; the leading role of grassroots Party organizations and the pioneering and exemplary role of Party members have been fully brought into play, leading to the high-quality development of community governance; democratic self-governance of the grassroots in the community has been effectively promoted, and grass-roots practice of people’s democracy in the entire process has been perfected; importance has been attached to fostering the professional qualities of community workers, and to upgrading the professional qualities of community leaders represented by neighborhood and village committees. The way to develop and improve China’s practice of community governance in the new era is paying attention to fostering the professional qualifications of community workers and improving the self-governance capacity of grass-roots mass self-governance organizations represented by neighborhood committees and village committees.

From Manipulation to Integration: the Strategic Transformation of Grassroots Control in China

The Vertically Decentralized Authoritarianism and the Mechanisms of Political Stability in China

Constructed Hierarchical Government Trust in China: Formation Mechanism and Political Effects

Democratic Localism: the Case of Grassroots Self-Governance in Urban China

Adaptive Social Mobilization in Grassroots Policy Implementation: Administrative Control and Multiple Participation

Control, Discretion and Bargaining: the Politics of Provincial Leader Rotation in China

Village Elections, Grassroots Governance and the Restructuring of State Power: An Empirical Study in Southern Peri-urban China

Non-institutional Factors in Shaping Rural Elections and Governance in China: a Pragmatist Perspective

Reinforcing Leninist Means of Corruption Control in China: Centralization, Regulatory Changes and Party-State Integration

Mediation and grassroots policing in China: Conflict resolution or social control?

The Rise and Fall of Local Elections in China: Theory and Empirical Evidence on the Autocrat's Trade-off

Participation and Competition: Innovations in Cadre Election and Selection in China's Townships

Expanding the Democratic Institutional Space in China:Towards a New Pattern of Grassroots Democracy

Led by the Party Building: The Construction of Urban and Rural Community Governance System Under the Concept of Self-governance and Co-governance

Grass-Roots Democracy:Chinese Practice of Democracy Construction in a Country

The Rise and Fall of Local Elections in China

"Whole-Process People’s Democracy" in China: Evidence from Shanghai

The Direct Election of the Urban Residents Committee and the Urban Grassroots Governance

Campaign-style Personnel Management: Task Responsiveness and Selective Delocalization during China's Anti-corruption Crackdown, 2013–2020

Xi’s Leadership and Party-Centred Governance in China

Riding on the power of the masses? How different modes of mass mobilization shape local elite bargaining in China