Abstract:Introduction Governments around the globe now seek to judge the performance of their public services. This has given rise to the introduction of a range of complex and sophisticated regimes to provide information to politicians, managers and the public on organizational success or failures. Examples include an index of measures of performance of Chinese cities (China Daily 2004), the Comprehensive Performance Assessment in English local government (Audit Commission 2002), the Government Performance Results Act 1992 in the US, the Service Improvement Initiative in Canada, the Putting Service First scheme in Australia, Strategic Results Area Networks in New Zealand, Management by Results in Sweden, and Regulation of Performance Management and Policy Evaluation in the Netherlands (Pollitt and Bouckaert 2004). Researchers have increasingly turned their attention to public service performance (e.g., see the Symposium edition of Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2005 (Boyne and Walker 2005), on the determinants of performance in public organizations). Despite such progress, a persistent problem for public management researchers and practitioners has been the conceptualisation and measurement of performance. Previous research has shown that organizational performance is multifaceted (Boyne 2003; Carter et al . 1992; Quinn and Rohrbaugh 1983; Venkatraman and Ramanujuam 1986). This is because public organizations are required to address a range of goals, some of which may be in conflict. Consequently, public organizations are obliged to focus attention on multiple dimensions of performance. Boyne's (2002) review of these dimensions isolated five conceptual categories – outputs, efficiency, effectiveness, responsiveness and democratic outcomes.

The politics of performance measurement in China

Assessment of Innovative Performance Management in Chinese Police System

External Accountability vs Internal Control:On the Orientations of Government Performance Measurement

Study of Government Performance Management in China:A Historical Review and Critical Assessment

Reassessing the Performance Evaluation System in the Xi Jinping Era: Changes and Implications

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND CITIZEN SATISFACTION WITH THE GOVERNMENT: EVIDENCE FROM CHINESE MUNICIPALITIES

Citizen Participation in Government Performance Measurement:A Historical Review and Assessment

The role and influencing factors of government performance evaluation: A test of Chinese public officials’ perceptions in Gaoming district

Does Performance Matter? Evaluating Political Selection Along the Chinese Administrative Ladder

Performance Measurement System and Relationships with Performance Results

Seeking performance or control? Tethered party innovation in China’s performance evaluation system

The drivers of local environmental policy in China: An analysis of Shenzhen’s environmental performance management system, 2007–2015

Performance management and environmental governance in China

Political Consideration in Performance Appraisal——On the Basis of Content Analysis in China Contex

Political Incentives, Bureaucratic Behaviors and Political Budget Cycles in China

Assessing the Administrative Practice of Environmental Protection Performance Evaluation in China: the Case of Shenzhen

Public Service Performance: Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: An empirical exploration

The Mandate of Heaven and Performance Legitimation in Historical and Contemporary China

From Control to Management Performance: on the Classification System Reform of Chinese Party and Government Leaders

A Study on the legalization of China's Government Performance Management and Assessment

The performance evaluation model and its demonstration of Liaoning provincial department