External Accountability vs Internal Control:On the Orientations of Government Performance Measurement

Zhiren Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-464X.2015.03.001
2015-01-01
Abstract:The utilities of performance measurement ( PM) can be seen from both lower-order technical and higher-order value perspectives. Value perspective implies the fundamental orientations of PM. Gov-ernment PM can be divided into two types from value perspective: external accountability and internal control. External accountability type of PM in developed countries has three main features:a clearly ar-ticulated sense of accountability; citizen-centered performance indicators; and active public participa-tion. Internal control orientation of PM in China demonstrates itself in three ways: government domi-nance and the lack of public participation;top-down and unidirectional approach in PM, and tactic use of PM as a tool of personnel reshuffle in some cases. A transformation of orientation of PM from internal control to external accountability therefore, should be a key task of reform in the foreseeable future.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?